I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub. -r
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rodric > I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME. > > I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using > the tgz and give it a go, > > Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the artifact? > > If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev and > start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote > results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings > which would be similar as the found in the dev list. > > -- Carlos > >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks. >> >> -r >> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <s...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rodric, >>> >>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of >> installation. >>> >>> I can definitely work on that. >>> >>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating the >> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release. >>> >>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have >> documented some known issues in the instruction. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best wishes. >>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博) >>> >>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM >> Cloud >>> >>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, >>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182> >>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United >> States >>> >>> -----Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: ----- >>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org >>> From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> >>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main >> OpenWhisk module >>> >>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote. >> In >>> completing this checking list: >>> >>> [x] Download links are valid. >>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. >>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current >> release. >>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. >>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code) >>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo >>> gradle-wrapper.jar). >>> >>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I >>> opened the following issues: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug) >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug) >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212 >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug, >>> blocks deployment) >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214 >>> >>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world. >> I'd >>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I >>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug). >>> >>> -r >>> >>
