Sorry Rodric my second part of my email was intended for Vincent Vincent you want to do an RC2 and address or continue since you are release manager I don’t want to impose anything on you.
But if you want to continue I think you have enough votes to close it and move forward with IPMC. On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub. > > -r > > > On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Rodric > > I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME. > > > > I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using > > the tgz and give it a go, > > > > Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the > artifact? > > > > If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev > and > > start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote > > results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings > > which would be similar as the found in the dev list. > > > > -- Carlos > > > >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -r > >> > >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <s...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Rodric, > >>> > >>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of > >> installation. > >>> > >>> I can definitely work on that. > >>> > >>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating > the > >> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release. > >>> > >>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have > >> documented some known issues in the instruction. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Best wishes. > >>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博) > >>> > >>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM > >> Cloud > >>> > >>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, > >>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182> > >>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United > >> States > >>> > >>> -----Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: ----- > >>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org > >>> From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> > >>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM > >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main > >> OpenWhisk module > >>> > >>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the > vote. > >> In > >>> completing this checking list: > >>> > >>> [x] Download links are valid. > >>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. > >>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current > >> release. > >>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo. > >>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with > scan-code) > >>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo > >>> gradle-wrapper.jar). > >>> > >>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I > >>> opened the following issues: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207 > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208 > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug) > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210 > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug) > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212 > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug, > >>> blocks deployment) > >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214 > >>> > >>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world. > >> I'd > >>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and > I > >>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug). > >>> > >>> -r > >>> > >> >
