Andi Vajda wrote: > I think it's still too early in the Chandler release cycle to run the
Since some others echoed this it seems clear we will go with the case by case method. > improvement. For instance, most of the performance tests used in 0.6 are > too far from end user 'reality' to make regressions an auto-backed out > showstopper. A goal for 0.7 in the performance tracking area should be > to have more tests reflecting real end-user situations. That's a little vague. What would you change, explicitly? The issue of using backed out repository and restoring from there so that we load items from disk is a known issue and I am working on it - hopefully I can get it done by the end of the week (a couple of tests are failing in that mode and there is a possible state leakage between tests). -- Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
