On Dec 6, 2005, at 10:47 AM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
There are a couple of approaches we could take. One is to
concentrate on
the cases that are furthest from our 0.6 goals. The other is to
take a
broad look and work on all the cases that are not yet under the ideal
limits. In the first case our numeric goals would remain
unchanged. In
the second case we would set new, tighter goals for the cases that
did
make it under acceptable limits but are not yet under ideal limits.
Personally I am in favor of the latter. I have some initial
suggestions
here:
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/
ZeroSevenPerfGoals20051204
Another approach we could take is to increase the size of the
collections (and repository) that we expect to handle. Instead of a
3000 item calendar, we could say a 10,000 item repository, with
several collections/calendars. Nailing down the tenets might help
us pick a good target, but the general goal here would be to
ratchet up the size of the repository. We could combine this with
focus on a specific set of cases and/or ratcheting down the
response times.
I agree that we need to start using repository sizes that are closer
to what we might see in 1.0. 10,000 items is a start in that
direction.
----
Ted Leung Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
PGP Fingerprint: 1003 7870 251F FA71 A59A CEE3 BEBA 2B87 F5FC 4B42
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
