On Feb 22, 2006, at 1:03 PM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Ted Leung wrote:
I don't think that a product named OSAF is where most people will
look
to file a bug on a website. As far as several bugs, i have a
list of
problems with the websites that I could start filing as bugs. Would
that convince you?
I don't disagree with you that we have lots of issues with several of
our websites. I'm just proposing that these should be components under
the OSAF product.
I agree that there will be non website related infrastructure/IT bugs
to be filed. What I prefer, for the sake of having people file bugs
against the websites, is for the website(s) to be their own product.
I recognize that the guided bugzilla says that website bugs belong
under OSAF, but my experience is that people don't read most of that
text anyway.
You also expressed reluctance to create additional components for the
project websites, i.e chandler.osafoundation.org,
cosmo.osafoundation.org, etc, which is why I mentioned that I could
start filing bugs.
So, could you tell me your opinion on components for the project
websites?
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
