Philippe Bossut wrote:
> Glad to see we're having this discussion so. I think we can converge soon.
We continued this discussion on IRC today. I'll summarize the current
thinking. The wiki page has also been updated at
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/BugzillaComponentsZeroPointSeven
Accounts to stay as Accounts (like more general better)
[snip]
Documentation: CSG/Web still unclear.
There was some discussion on this topic pointing to benefits, particularly in making it easier for community members to submit problems, broken links, inaccuracies, format suggestions, etc. in the tools we use to communicate with our community; the websites, wiki, blog, maillists, and irc. Currently I monitor and respond to e-mail sent to info at osafoundation.org or to webmaster where some of these are reported, but channeling this through bugzilla would be better and provide a single communications channel for reporting problems with what we do so we can fix broken code or remove/update an outdated webpage.
Also if the decision has been made to use bugzilla to track tasks, then it would be useful to have a component to collect those tasks that bridge dev docs, user docs, web design, implementation as we have in the past during our release efforts.
+1 for Documentation components (and I do think we should have both dev and user components) for the documentation content.
But I think we also need a Website/wiki component to cover the infrastructure for the delivery of the content as well.
Pieter
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
