(@jukka, if you think so too, I propose spinning up the release process to
produce another RC, based on the modified build scripts,
and re-raise the VOTE?)

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 9:49 PM Otto van der Schaaf <osch...@we-amp.com>
wrote:

> So I had another look, and I think we are still good with respect to
> licenses.
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:57 PM Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good, thanks! I'll go through the list of licenses also myself
>> before +1'ing on the VOTE thread.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:40 PM Otto van der Schaaf <osch...@we-amp.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I created a PR addressing the license/notice issues:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pagespeed-mod/pull/1955
>>> Notice did become a little elaborate, I bubbled up everything I could
>>> find in the dependencies.
>>>
>>> I'll now look into moving the sources in the tarball up one level.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:23 PM Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks good, thanks! The only addition I'd make is an explanatory header
>>>> between the ASL and the other licenses. Something like this:
>>>>
>>>> MOD_PAGESPEED SUBCOMPONENTS
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Done
>>>
>>>
>>>> mod_pagespeed includes components with separate copyright notices and
>>>> license terms. Your use of these components is subject to the terms and
>>>> conditions of the following licenses:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have we checked that all the 3rd party licenses fall within the policy
>>>> in http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think I checked that in the past, yes, I couldn't find any violations
>>> back then. I don't think anything relevant has
>>> changed meantime, but let me double check.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Excluding the Apache-licensed deps is fine, though we should
>>>> double-check whether any of them have NOTICE files that should be merged
>>>> into the top-level mod_pagespeed NOTICE.
>>>>
>>>> In general it looks like our NOTICE file includes too much detail. As a
>>>> general rule anything that's already included in LICENSE probably shouldn't
>>>> be covered in NOTICE. And something that's not explicitly required to be in
>>>> the NOTICE should generally be left out. See
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice for details.
>>>> Based on a quick reading (to be verified in more detail), it looks like the
>>>> following might be sufficient for us:
>>>>
>>>> Apache PageSpeed
>>>> Copyright 2018-2019 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>
>>>> This product includes software developed at
>>>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>
>>>> Codebase originally donated by Google Inc:
>>>> Copyright (C) 2010-2017 Google Inc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:08 AM Otto van der Schaaf <
>>>> osch...@we-amp.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> As a first step, I'm proposing up update LICENSE so it would look like:
>>>>> https://gist.github.com/oschaaf/09458d082cf767fb24353a82cb3b4ae9
>>>>> Indeed, dependencies where missing in there, nice catch. Note: I left
>>>>> out Apache licensenced deps
>>>>> like apr and serf, is that OK? I tried to list every other dependency
>>>>> which was
>>>>> licensed otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's also our NOTICE which would be good to double check:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pagespeed-mod/blob/master/NOTICE
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be really grateful if someone could verify I did the right
>>>>> thing here.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:10 PM Longinos Ferrando <lof...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2019/09/11 21:22:19, Otto van der Schaaf <osch...@we-amp.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi all,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Raising a vote for accepting the
>>>>>> mod-pagespeed-beta-1.14.36.1-r0.tar.bz2
>>>>>> > for release, staged at:
>>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~oschaaf/mod_pagespeed/1.14.36.1-rc2/
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We need three +1 votes to move forward and post it for review on the
>>>>>> > incubator general list for approval.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > For those who want context on the release procedure:
>>>>>> > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Otto
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to