Thanks Julien.

I just tested merging a PR and it works. Btw, the following line in the
README did not work for me:

git remote add apache-github [email protected]:apache/parquet-mr.git

I had permission issues when running the script. I had to use this one:

git remote add apache-github https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr

Should I edit the README.md file or there is something wrong I was doing?

- Sergio



On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Cheng Lian <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Julien for setting this up!
>
> Just created a placeholder JIRA ticket for new committers to test their
> committership in the future:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-398
>
> They can create PR to update dev/COMMITTERS.md and have the JIRA ID of
> this ticket in the PR title. Similar to the one I just opened:
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/298
>
> Cheng
>
>
> On 12/3/15 3:24 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
>
>> Hi Sergio and Cheng,
>>
>> (cc'ing the dev list since this is useful information in general)
>> I have added both of you to the parquet ldap group.
>> That gives you write access to the repo.
>> Please open a pull request to add yourselves to this list:
>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/blob/master/dev/COMMITTERS.md
>> Some details on how to merge a PR here:
>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/blob/master/dev/README.md
>> Feel free to send feedback or improve those tools.
>> The process to merge a Pull Request is to have a committer (that includes
>> yourselves now!) review and give it a +1 and then merge it using
>> dev/merge_parquet_pr.py.
>> Please note that the tool will require the PR description to be prefixed
>> by the JIRA id. ex: "PARQUET-1234567: my awesome contribution"
>> If the contribution is coming from a committer, a +1 is expected from
>> another committer (feel free to nag people).
>>
>> One does not need to be a committer to give a review, please encourage
>> others to give reviews too.
>> However a committer is required to commit! It is our responsibility as
>> committers to make sure contributions get committed or receive the
>> appropriate feedback so that they can be committed.
>>
>> Typically things that change public APIs need a little more consensus
>> than things that don't. Use your best judgement!
>>
>> Welcome again.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Julien
>>
>
>

Reply via email to