Thanks all. I'm gonna try to split the JIRAs into tracks so we can avoid working on patches in a suboptimal order. For example, many JIRAs cannot be completed until PARQUET-499 is done (Scanner tests and dictionary encoding rely on PLAIN encoding for all Parquet types).
- Wes On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Majeti, Deepak <[email protected]> wrote: > This looks good to me as well. > With little more effort towards testing, March 1 should be a doable target. > > On 02/15/2016 07:11 PM, Julien Le Dem wrote: >> Looks good. I commented in the doc >> >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Aliaksei Sandryhaila <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> The list looks reasonable. I've added PARQUET-530 to add support for LZO >>> compression. >>> >>> Not sure we'll be able to get everything done by March 1, but it's a good >>> target. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 02/13/2016 12:32 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: >>> >>>> Dear friends, >>>> >>>> I made a pass through the JIRAs and feature roadmap and listed out >>>> essential tasks for reaching a milestone that would merit a versioned >>>> code release, see: >>>> >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyquzupLc3UkErO2OhqLJNQ9a84Cccc8LVUSuLQz39o/edit# >>>> >>>> I will be pressing for all of this to be completed with target date >>>> (for a parquet-cpp 0.1 RC) of March 1. I think with the current >>>> cadence and progress this should be achievable. >>>> >>>> It would be great if Aliaksei, Deepak, Julien, and Nong could briefly >>>> review the items and let me know if there are any blind spots / things >>>> we've missed? >>>> >>>> If we agree on the scope of the release and timeline, we should create >>>> ordered "tracks" of interrelated JIRAs as many of them depend on the >>>> others for functionality and unit test tools that will be created. >>>> This will reduce ambiguity about what needs doing next and reduce >>>> refactor churn / merge conflicts. >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> Wes >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > -- > Deepak Majeti >
