[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16483843#comment-16483843
]
Zoltan Ivanfi commented on PARQUET-1295:
----------------------------------------
I agree with [~vrozov], in fact I used the same argument [on the mailing
list|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7db8ec906b29c917d70120fab78382cdfb2406c4188f10829933ed87@%3Cdev.parquet.apache.org%3E].
{quote}That information is hidden somewhere in the pom file.{quote}
It's actually even worse than that. The exclusions are only added to the pom
file when a breaking change is made, so even that list is unsuitable for
determining whether something is considered internal, as it only contains those
parts of the internal API that we already broke.
> Parquet libraries do not follow proper semantic versioning
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-1295
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1295
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Vlad Rozov
> Priority: Major
>
> There are changes between 1.8.0 and 1.10.0 that break API compatibility. A
> minor version change is supposed to be backward compatible with 1.9.0 and
> 1.8.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
