Hi Junjie,

Since there are ongoing improvements addressing review comments, I would
hold off with the vote for a few more days until the specification settles.

Br,

Zoltan

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:32 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Parquet committers and developers
>
> We are waiting for your important ballot:)
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:21 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, there are some public benchmark results, such as the official
> > benchmark from xxhash site (http://www.xxhash.com/) and published
> > comparison from smhasher project
> > (https://github.com/rurban/smhasher/).
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:25 AM Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you have any benchmark data to support the choice of hash function?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:41 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Parquet developers
> > > >
> > > > To simplify the voting, I 'd like to update voting content to the
> spec
> > > > with xxHash hash strategy. Now you can reply with +1 or -1.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your participation.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:23 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Parquet developers
> > > > >
> > > > > Parquet Bloom filter has been developed for a while, per the
> discussion on the mail list, it's time to call a vote for spec to move
> forward. The current spec can be found at
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/BloomFilter.md.
> There are some different options about the internal hash choice of Bloom
> filter and the PR is for that concern.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I 'd like to propose to vote the spec + hash option, for
> example:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 to spec and xxHash
> > > > > +1 to spec and murmur3
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > Please help to vote, any feedback is also welcome in the
> discussion thread.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks & Best Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks & Best Regards
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Best Regards
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Best Regards
>

Reply via email to