+1 (binding)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 9:57 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Parquet developers > > I'd like to resume this vote, you can start to vote now. Thanks for your time. > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:29 PM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I see, will resume this next week. Thanks. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Zoltan Ivanfi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Junjie, > > > > > > Since there are ongoing improvements addressing review comments, I would > > > hold off with the vote for a few more days until the specification > > > settles. > > > > > > Br, > > > > > > Zoltan > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:32 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Parquet committers and developers > > > > > > > > We are waiting for your important ballot:) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:21 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are some public benchmark results, such as the official > > > > > benchmark from xxhash site (http://www.xxhash.com/) and published > > > > > comparison from smhasher project > > > > > (https://github.com/rurban/smhasher/). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:25 AM Wes McKinney <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any benchmark data to support the choice of hash > > > > > > function? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 8:41 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parquet developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To simplify the voting, I 'd like to update voting content to the > > > > spec > > > > > > > with xxHash hash strategy. Now you can reply with +1 or -1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your participation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:23 AM 俊杰陈 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Parquet developers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Parquet Bloom filter has been developed for a while, per the > > > > discussion on the mail list, it's time to call a vote for spec to move > > > > forward. The current spec can be found at > > > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/BloomFilter.md. > > > > There are some different options about the internal hash choice of Bloom > > > > filter and the PR is for that concern. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I 'd like to propose to vote the spec + hash option, for > > > > example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 to spec and xxHash > > > > > > > > +1 to spec and murmur3 > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please help to vote, any feedback is also welcome in the > > > > discussion thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > -- > Thanks & Best Regards
