+1 (binding) On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:49 PM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) rom me > > > > On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 on this > >> > >> BTW, I created following PRs to enable github issues to these repos: > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255 > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1362 > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/50 > >> > >> I will not merge them until the formal vote passes. > >> > >> Best, > >> Gang > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:43 PM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > Discussing migration of parquet-cpp issues into Arrow's GitHub issue > >> > tracker [1] produced the idea of moving other parquet tickets into > GitHub > >> > issue trackers as well. > >> > Since parquet-format, parquet-site and parquet-testing separate repos, > >> > issues related to them should probably be moved into their issue > >> trackers. > >> > > >> > To preview the state after migration I've split tickets by component > (see > >> > mapping below) and imported them into testing repos for preview. > >> > > >> > jira/parquet-avro --> github/parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-cascading --> github/parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-cli --> github/parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-cpp --> github/arrow > >> > jira/parquet-format --> github//parquet-format > >> > jira/parquet-hadoop --> github//parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-mr --> github/parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-pig --> github/parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-protobuf --> github/parquet-java > >> > jira/parquet-site --> github/parquet-site > >> > jira/parquet-testing --> github/parquet-testing > >> > jira/parquet-thrift --> github/parquet-java > >> > > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-cpp/issues > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-java/issues > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-format/issues > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-site/issues > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-testing/issues > >> > > >> > I would like to start a discussion here to see if the community is > open > >> to > >> > migration, should proposed migration be amended and to call for a > vote if > >> > we reach consensus. > >> > > >> > For some considerations the Arrow community had when migrating you can > >> also > >> > see related issue [2]. > >> > > >> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zklp0lwcbcsdzgxoxy6wqjwrvt6y4s9p > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542 > >> > > >> > Rok > >> > > >> >
