Maybe we should just start the vote? On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Julien Le Dem <jul...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 4:49 PM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 4:42 PM, Micah Kornfield wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) rom me > > > > > > On Thursday, June 13, 2024, Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 on this > > >> > > >> BTW, I created following PRs to enable github issues to these repos: > > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255 > > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1362 > > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/50 > > >> > > >> I will not merge them until the formal vote passes. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Gang > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:43 PM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > Hi all, > > >> > > > >> > Discussing migration of parquet-cpp issues into Arrow's GitHub issue > > >> > tracker [1] produced the idea of moving other parquet tickets into > > GitHub > > >> > issue trackers as well. > > >> > Since parquet-format, parquet-site and parquet-testing separate > repos, > > >> > issues related to them should probably be moved into their issue > > >> trackers. > > >> > > > >> > To preview the state after migration I've split tickets by component > > (see > > >> > mapping below) and imported them into testing repos for preview. > > >> > > > >> > jira/parquet-avro --> github/parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-cascading --> github/parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-cli --> github/parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-cpp --> github/arrow > > >> > jira/parquet-format --> github//parquet-format > > >> > jira/parquet-hadoop --> github//parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-mr --> github/parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-pig --> github/parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-protobuf --> github/parquet-java > > >> > jira/parquet-site --> github/parquet-site > > >> > jira/parquet-testing --> github/parquet-testing > > >> > jira/parquet-thrift --> github/parquet-java > > >> > > > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-cpp/issues > > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-java/issues > > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-format/issues > > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-site/issues > > >> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-testing/issues > > >> > > > >> > I would like to start a discussion here to see if the community is > > open > > >> to > > >> > migration, should proposed migration be amended and to call for a > > vote if > > >> > we reach consensus. > > >> > > > >> > For some considerations the Arrow community had when migrating you > can > > >> also > > >> > see related issue [2]. > > >> > > > >> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/zklp0lwcbcsdzgxoxy6wqjwrvt6y4s > 9p > > >> > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14542 > > >> > > > >> > Rok > > >> > > > >> > > >
