I started looking today but haven’t had time to finish. Let me get back to y’all soon. Best Julien
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 13:06 Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like we only have 2 +1 votes from PMC members so far. I would > appreciate it if another PMC member could review and cast a vote? > > Thanks, > Micah > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:37 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, at 7:59 PM, Edward Seidl wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thanks Micah! > > > Ed > > > > > > From: Vinoo Ganesh <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> > > > Date: Thursday, July 4, 2024 at 6:19 AM > > > To: dev@parquet.apache.org <dev@parquet.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt proposal on new features for parquet-format > > > and release for Parquet Java > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thank you Micah for all of your work on this! > > > > > > > > > <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:28 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (non binding) > > >> > > >> Thank you Micah for all the effort you have put into gathering > feedback > > and > > >> building consensus > > >> > > >> Andrew > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 2:48 AM Alkis Evlogimenos > > >> <alkis.evlogime...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 this is great, it puts a lot of clarity in the process. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 4:26 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Generally +1 on the proposal. Thanks for finalizing it! > > >> > > > > >> > > I have left a comment regarding the next major release of > > parquet-java. > > >> > > > > >> > > Best, > > >> > > Gang > > >> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:55 AM Micah Kornfield < > > emkornfi...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > This vote is whether to adopt and merge [1][2] a proposal for > > >> providing > > >> > > > formal guidance on new features are added to the Parquet format, > > >> > > > recommendations on when incompatible features should be turned > on > > in > > >> > > > implementations by default and a proposed release cadence for > > >> > > Parquet-java. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > This was first published for discussion on the dev mailing list > on > > >> [3]. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Given we are headed into a holiday weekend in the US the vote > will > > >> > remain > > >> > > > open for until at least Wednesday, July 10th to ensure adequate > > time > > >> > for > > >> > > > people who might be taking time away from their computer. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > Micah > > >> > > > > > >> > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the guidance in the PR proposals and merge them. > > >> > > > [ ] +0 > > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the guidance because .... > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/258 > > >> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/61/files > > >> > > > [3] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bcc13dtdvnxvg55nhyowbwzqomfljgvb > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >
