FYI, I am working on commenting on the PR and should be able to finish today (PT). Overall I think this is good and I am making suggestions along the way.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:50 PM Julien Le Dem <jul...@apache.org> wrote: > I started looking today but haven’t had time to finish. > Let me get back to y’all soon. > Best > Julien > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 13:06 Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It looks like we only have 2 +1 votes from PMC members so far. I would >> appreciate it if another PMC member could review and cast a vote? >> >> Thanks, >> Micah >> >> On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 7:37 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024, at 7:59 PM, Edward Seidl wrote: >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > Thanks Micah! >> > > Ed >> > > >> > > From: Vinoo Ganesh <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> >> > > Date: Thursday, July 4, 2024 at 6:19 AM >> > > To: dev@parquet.apache.org <dev@parquet.apache.org> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt proposal on new features for parquet-format >> > > and release for Parquet Java >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > Thank you Micah for all of your work on this! >> > > >> > > >> > > <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:28 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 (non binding) >> > >> >> > >> Thank you Micah for all the effort you have put into gathering >> feedback >> > and >> > >> building consensus >> > >> >> > >> Andrew >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 2:48 AM Alkis Evlogimenos >> > >> <alkis.evlogime...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > +1 this is great, it puts a lot of clarity in the process. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 4:26 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Generally +1 on the proposal. Thanks for finalizing it! >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I have left a comment regarding the next major release of >> > parquet-java. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Best, >> > >> > > Gang >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:55 AM Micah Kornfield < >> > emkornfi...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > This vote is whether to adopt and merge [1][2] a proposal for >> > >> providing >> > >> > > > formal guidance on new features are added to the Parquet >> format, >> > >> > > > recommendations on when incompatible features should be turned >> on >> > in >> > >> > > > implementations by default and a proposed release cadence for >> > >> > > Parquet-java. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > This was first published for discussion on the dev mailing >> list on >> > >> [3]. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Given we are headed into a holiday weekend in the US the vote >> will >> > >> > remain >> > >> > > > open for until at least Wednesday, July 10th to ensure adequate >> > time >> > >> > for >> > >> > > > people who might be taking time away from their computer. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks, >> > >> > > > Micah >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the guidance in the PR proposals and merge them. >> > >> > > > [ ] +0 >> > >> > > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the guidance because .... >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/258 >> > >> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/61/files >> > >> > > > [3] >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/bcc13dtdvnxvg55nhyowbwzqomfljgvb >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >
