No, the proposed approach comes from a quick math from all received responses which is acceptable by most people.
If people have strong opinions to use a dedicated repo for variant spec and impl, would it be good to express "+1 for dedicated repo" in this vote as well? On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:10 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did we actually close on this, I thought some people were in favor of a > separate repo? I think this might be important in terms of release > cadence? > > On Monday, September 9, 2024, Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I’d like to start a vote for adopting the Variant specification and > library > > from > > the Spark project. This allows the Variant binary format and shredding > > format > > to be more broadly used by other interested projects and systems. > > > > For repositories to host the Variant specification and library: > > - apache/parquet-format will add documentation for the specification > > - apache/parquet-java will add a new module for the Java implementation > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6h58hj39lhqtcyd2hlsyvqm4lzdh4b9z > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > > > Thanks! > > Gang > > >
