Let's just vote for the adoption in this thread and discuss the location in https://lists.apache.org/thread/xwd3mqjr9bdpg3jcnlprbyb4x09c9ymj
Cast my own vote: +1 for adding the variant spec to parquet Thanks! Gang On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 5:27 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) for adding the variant spec to parquet > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:08 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 on adding the variant spec to Parquet > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:23 PM Russell Spitzer < > > russell.spit...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (Non-binding) This will be great for universal adoption of the > variant > > > type > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 2:14 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for adding the variant spec to Parquet. I'm looking forward to > > working > > > > on the addition of shredding. > > > > > > > > As for the details, I think I also prefer a separate repository, > > > > `parquet-variant`, but I don't think we necessarily need to determine > > > that > > > > question up front. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:05 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Antoine, > > > > > > > > > > A separate project was my 1st proposal in the original discussion > > > > > on the dev@iceberg ML :). > > > > > > > > > > TBH, I'm open to putting them either in existing repos or a > dedicated > > > > > parquet-variant repo. The intention of this thread is to try to > push > > > the > > > > > discussion to reach a consensus. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Gang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:54 PM Antoine Pitrou < > anto...@python.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Gang, > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming we do want to adopt this in Parquet, I would very much > > > > > > recommend separate repositories for this. Putting the spec inside > > > > > > `parquet-format` breeds confusion, IMHO, and may discourage third > > > > > > parties from considering this standalone, non-Parquet, data > format. > > > > > > > > > > > > (but for the same reason, I would recommand a separate project as > > > well > > > > > > :-)) > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:48:03 +0800 > > > > > > Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I’d like to start a vote for adopting the Variant specification > > and > > > > > > library > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > the Spark project. This allows the Variant binary format and > > > > shredding > > > > > > > format > > > > > > > to be more broadly used by other interested projects and > systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For repositories to host the Variant specification and library: > > > > > > > - apache/parquet-format will add documentation for the > > > specification > > > > > > > - apache/parquet-java will add a new module for the Java > > > > implementation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please refer to the discussion thread: > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6h58hj39lhqtcyd2hlsyvqm4lzdh4b9z > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal > > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because … > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > Gang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
