+1 from my end as well.

The test-suites of both Spark <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48970>
and Iceberg <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11656> are all green!
Also checked signature, checksum and licenses.

Kind regards,
Fokko

Op vr 29 nov 2024 om 02:56 schreef Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com>:

> +1
>
> Verified the build, checksum and signature locally. Thanks Fokko!
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 6:27 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache Parquet
> > 1.15.0 release.
> >
> > The commit id is 4665401d36e468c988322f78621da7c2d1c22ede
> >
> >    - This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-1.15.0-rc2
> >    -
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/tree/4665401d36e468c988322f78621da7c2d1c22ede
> >
> >
> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> >
> >    -
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/apache-parquet-1.15.0-rc2
> >
> >
> > You can find the KEYS file here:
> >
> >    - https://downloads.apache.org/parquet/KEYS
> >
> >
> > You can find the changelog here:
> >
> >    -
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/releases/tag/apache-parquet-1.15.0-rc2
> >
> >
> > Binary artifacts are staged in Nexus here:
> >
> >    -
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheparquet-1067/
> >
> >
> > After RC1, the following patches have been applied:
> >
> >    - MINOR: Add shading for JDK22-specific classes.
> >    <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3081>
> >    - MINOR: Revert buildnumber-maven-plugin to 3.2.0
> >    <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3082>
> >    - GH-3086: <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/issues/3086> Allow
> >    for empty beans <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3087>
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test. Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet 1.15.0
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Fokko Driesprong
> >
>

Reply via email to