Hi team, I noticed Parquet java has some stale PRs from a few years ago that have not seen activity in a long time. It can make it harder to tell which PRs are currently active and ready for review, and may add maintenance overhead.
Would it make sense to introduce a stale PR policy? For example, marking a PR as inactive after 3 months of no activity, with 1 warning at 2 months to inform the author that it would be auto closed if there is no response. Contributors could always reopen their PR if they plan to continue the work. This could make the project more clear and friendly for newcomers and reduce maintenance overhead for maintainers. Would love to know what you think. Regards, Arnav
