Great idea. On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 10:40 AM Arnav Balyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi team, > > I noticed Parquet java has some stale PRs from a few years ago that have > not seen activity in a long time. It can make it harder to tell which PRs > are currently active and ready for review, and may add maintenance > overhead. > > Would it make sense to introduce a stale PR policy? For example, marking a > PR as inactive after 3 months of no activity, with 1 warning at 2 months to > inform the author that it would be auto closed if there is no response. > > Contributors could always reopen their PR if they plan to continue the > work. This could make the project more clear and friendly for newcomers and > reduce maintenance overhead for maintainers. > > Would love to know what you think. > > Regards, > Arnav > -- Aaron Niskode-Dossett, Data Engineering -- Etsy
