Gábor, thanks for validating. The spotless issue is related to the Java version. I ran into the same with JDK17, but switching back to JDK11 fixed it for me. The next release will work with JDK17+, so that should solve the problem.
Antoine, I think that's a great suggestion. Updating the release guidelines should fix this for future releases: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/blob/production/content/en/docs/Contribution%20Guidelines/releasing.md#6-send-a-vote-e-mail-to-devparquetapacheorg Kind regards, Fokko Sent with Proton Mail secure email. On Tuesday, July 21st, 2026 at 17:19, Peter Toth <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 1:08 PM Gábor Szádovszky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The build on the rc1 tag (and on the tarball as well) fails with format > > violations. mvn spotless:apply solves the issue but it is strange how that > > got in. CI should have failed as well. > > > > I've also tested signatures, the tarball content, build/tests, and a Dremio > > build with the maven artifacts. All passed. > > I do not have a strong opinion whether we shall fail this RC only because > > of the format issue, but it worth investigating how it got in. > > > > +0 (binding) > > > > Gang Wu <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. júl. 21., K, 4:23): > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 2:36 AM Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2026/07/20 14:29:52 Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > I propose the following RC to be released as official Apache Parquet > > > > 1.18.0 release. > > > > ... > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet 1.18.0 > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > * Verified signatures and hashes on the following files as per > > > > https://apache.org/info/verification.html > > > > - apache-parquet-1.18.0.tar.gz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > > > * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files > > > > > > > > (Looks like the KEYS file has been updated.) > > > > > > > > > >
