So you’ll switch out the calls to toRGB() for something else?

-- John

On 7 Aug 2014, at 13:19, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote:

> Color spaces are the way they have always been in 1.8, i.e. "not always 
> correct". Anything drawn in a colorspace that isn't looking correct in 1.8 
> won't be correct in a shading too.
> 
> And no, they are no shading API changes in 1.8.
> 
> Tilman
> 
> Am 07.08.2014 20:22, schrieb John Hewson:
>> Tilman,
>> 
>> That’s very compelling, with tests like that the only concern would be not 
>> making breaking API changes, which shouldn’t be too hard.
>> 
>> What about colour spaces though? 1.8 doesn’t have toRGB() built-in to the 
>> colour spaces unlike 2.0.
>> 
>> -- John
>> 
>> On 7 Aug 2014, at 10:25, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> The original shading packages 1-5 were also added to 1.8.5 (PDFBOX-615 
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-615>) and the changes are 
>>> well tested. I have now over 250 test files (about 50-100 of them deal with 
>>> shading), and I've also tested thousands of files from the digitalcorpora 
>>> site without any shading related exception that was a regression, the only 
>>> exception was a bug that has been there the whole time. The optimizations 
>>> include many bugfixes as well, that came up in the work.
>>> 
>>> Tilman
>>> 
>>> Am 07.08.2014 19:00, schrieb John Hewson:
>>>> There's still new stuff in there, and optimisations are not bug fixes. It 
>>>> just seems like a lot of new code for a stable release.
>>>> 
>>>> -- John
>>>> 
>>>>> On 7 Aug 2014, at 09:52, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I disagree. I always try to add the new features to 1.8 when possible, 
>>>>> i.e. when there's no change of structure needed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Besides, the shadings 1,2,3,4,5 are already part of 1.8, whats new is the 
>>>>> optimizations, support of BBox and types 6 and 7.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tilman
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am 07.08.2014 18:48, schrieb John Hewson:
>>>>>> Perhaps we should stop adding new features to 1.8, and only fix the most 
>>>>>> problematic bugs?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- John
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 7 Aug 2014, at 09:11, Tilman Hausherr <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> but after I've ported the GSoC2014-improved shading package to 1.8
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tilman
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 07.08.2014 12:35, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> there is already a number of solved issues and I guess it's
>>>>>>>> time for a new bugfix release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm working on PDFBOX-2250 and I'd like to finish that
>>>>>>>> first but how about a new release in 2 or 3 weeks from now?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>> 
> 

Reply via email to