Commenting where I can

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 5:43 PM Keith Wansbrough
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Following up on PJ's list of key issues remaining and my offer to help
> out, I've had a stab at working out the status of each of those issues - in
> particular, is someone already working on it and if so where?
>
> I've also identified a couple of other issues I think are worth addressing
> at this stage.
>
> Please can you check I've got this right? Then I can pick an open issue to
> work on, and maybe others can do so too.
>
> Key issues remaining in incubator-pekko:
>
> > * getting the Apache license headers into the source files
>
> Blocked on https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/38 ?
>
This is actually done, I have closed the github issue to reflect this.

>
> > * getting the nightlies published
>
> In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/103

Indeed, I am working on this (see
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/105). Note that the publish
terminology is currently being overloaded, currently the first iteration
of  Apache nightlies is working (see
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/60) but this is according to
Apache's release guidelines which is basically just copying content to a
folder (done by rsync). This is separate to an actual Maven publish to a
nexus repo (which is what I am working on now).

>
>
> > * getting the doc site up
>
> In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/99 ?
>
> > * careful review of the docs to remove any remaining references to
> > Lightbend or Akka (including logos)
>
> In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/100
>
> > * new look and feel for the docs (just so they don't look exactly like
> > the Akka ones)
>
> In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/92 ?
>
> > * review the automated test failures
>
> Seems open for contribution - I can't find an issue or PR for this.
>
> > * source and binary distributions
>
> In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/85 (see
> also https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/78)
>
 I wouldn't say this in progress, rather some prototyping/initial thinking
needs to be done on which sbt plugin to use.

>
> > * upgrade dependency jars if they have CVEs (unless we need to make
> > major changes to facilitate the upgrade)
>
> This is blocked for now; see explanation at
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/101
>
> I also see a few other things that need to be done:
>
> * Create a migration guide.
>
I am going to make an issue tangentially related to this because there are
non trivial technical tasks to solve for migrating, i.e. wire
incompatibility when migrating currently running Peko clusters.

>
> * Improve README and contribution guide, e.g., to make clear the current
> status and how to help right now (in our pre-v1.0 state), how to build and
> test locally, etc.
>
> * Resolve issues identified by podling scan (
> https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/pekko.html - currently reports many
> things missing which we do have; looks like this might be simply due to
> http://pekko.incubator.apache.org/ being a 404 at the moment.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --KW 8-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Wansbrough
> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 5:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: M0 release for incubator-pekko repo
>
> Thanks PJ. I hope to put some effort into Pekko over the next few weeks,
> so this comes at the right time! We have a few components currently using
> Akka and would much prefer to move to a community fork than either maintain
> an internal fork or rewrite from scratch. I'll take a look and see what we
> can do.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --KW 8-)
> --
> Keith Wansbrough
> he/him
> PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER
> Azure for Operators
> Office: +44 131 662 1212
> [email protected]
> https://github.com/kw217
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Benedict de Detrich <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 4:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: M0 release for incubator-pekko repo
>
> I agree with the sentiment that in general we should be focusing on
> pekko-core (in any case it's necessary for all of the other pekko modules).
>
> As mentioned in my earlier email today pekko-core is in a good state to
> work on right now, so it should be quite practical to split out the
> mentioned work amongst the community. The main technical task to be done is
> to figure out how migrating from an Akka to Pekko cluster would work.
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Matthew de Detrich
> Aiven Deutschland GmbH
> Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
>
> Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> m: +491603708037
> w: aiven.io e: [email protected] On 5. Jan 2023 at 16:16 +0100,
> PJ Fanning <[email protected]>, wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm going to ignore that there are other pekko git repos. A lot of the
> > same work needs to be done for those repos but it simplifies the
> > conversation to ignore them in this thread. We can come back to them
> > later.
> >
> > There has been good progress but there is a lot still to do. Some of
> > the key issues remaining include.
> > * getting the Apache license headers into the source files
> > * getting the nightlies published
> > * getting the doc site up
> > * careful review of the docs to remove any remaining references to
> > Lightbend or Akka (including logos)
> > * new look and feel for the docs (just so they don't look exactly like
> > the Akka ones)
> > * review the automated test failures
> > * source and binary distributions
> > (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> > hub.com%2Fapache%2Fincubator-pekko%2Fissues%2F78&data=05%7C01%7Ckeith.
> > wansbrough%40microsoft.com%7C7fe1bf8cc3124e5f972808daef3e0352%7C72f988
> > bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638085346898446381%7CUnknown%7CTW
> > FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
> > Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nkW09wiJ0vZMOSn%2FR7U8Gql%2FvC820cEaC7%2F
> > XUdQjfM0%3D&reserved=0)
> > * upgrade dependency jars if they have CVEs (unless we need to make
> > major changes to facilitate the upgrade)
> >
> > Some of these tasks are in progress but most of the tasks could be
> > taken on by willing volunteers.
> >
> > There may be an argument that we could try an early M0 or M1 release
> > to allow outside lib maintainers and other interested parties to try
> > out the new libs. There are probably not many of the items above that
> > could be delayed to a later milstone though - possibly some of the doc
> > and test tasks.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

-- 

Matthew de Detrich

*Aiven Deutschland GmbH*

Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B

Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen

*m:* +491603708037

*w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]

Reply via email to