I think we could create a new project called "First Pekko core prerelease"
(or something like that) and put all of the issues into the project, so we
have a quick overview of all the bits that need fixing before we can move
on to other modules.


On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:46 PM Matthew Benedict de Detrich
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Commenting where I can
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 5:43 PM Keith Wansbrough
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Following up on PJ's list of key issues remaining and my offer to help
> > out, I've had a stab at working out the status of each of those issues -
> in
> > particular, is someone already working on it and if so where?
> >
> > I've also identified a couple of other issues I think are worth
> addressing
> > at this stage.
> >
> > Please can you check I've got this right? Then I can pick an open issue
> to
> > work on, and maybe others can do so too.
> >
> > Key issues remaining in incubator-pekko:
> >
> > > * getting the Apache license headers into the source files
> >
> > Blocked on https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/38 ?
> >
> This is actually done, I have closed the github issue to reflect this.
>
> >
> > > * getting the nightlies published
> >
> > In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/103
>
> Indeed, I am working on this (see
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/105). Note that the publish
> terminology is currently being overloaded, currently the first iteration
> of  Apache nightlies is working (see
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/60) but this is according
> to
> Apache's release guidelines which is basically just copying content to a
> folder (done by rsync). This is separate to an actual Maven publish to a
> nexus repo (which is what I am working on now).
>
> >
> >
> > > * getting the doc site up
> >
> > In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/99 ?
> >
> > > * careful review of the docs to remove any remaining references to
> > > Lightbend or Akka (including logos)
> >
> > In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/pull/100
> >
> > > * new look and feel for the docs (just so they don't look exactly like
> > > the Akka ones)
> >
> > In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/92 ?
> >
> > > * review the automated test failures
> >
> > Seems open for contribution - I can't find an issue or PR for this.
> >
> > > * source and binary distributions
> >
> > In progress at https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/85 (see
> > also https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/78)
> >
>  I wouldn't say this in progress, rather some prototyping/initial thinking
> needs to be done on which sbt plugin to use.
>
> >
> > > * upgrade dependency jars if they have CVEs (unless we need to make
> > > major changes to facilitate the upgrade)
> >
> > This is blocked for now; see explanation at
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pekko/issues/101
> >
> > I also see a few other things that need to be done:
> >
> > * Create a migration guide.
> >
> I am going to make an issue tangentially related to this because there are
> non trivial technical tasks to solve for migrating, i.e. wire
> incompatibility when migrating currently running Peko clusters.
>
> >
> > * Improve README and contribution guide, e.g., to make clear the current
> > status and how to help right now (in our pre-v1.0 state), how to build
> and
> > test locally, etc.
> >
> > * Resolve issues identified by podling scan (
> > https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/pekko.html - currently reports many
> > things missing which we do have; looks like this might be simply due to
> > http://pekko.incubator.apache.org/ being a 404 at the moment.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --KW 8-)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Keith Wansbrough
> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 5:17 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: M0 release for incubator-pekko repo
> >
> > Thanks PJ. I hope to put some effort into Pekko over the next few weeks,
> > so this comes at the right time! We have a few components currently using
> > Akka and would much prefer to move to a community fork than either
> maintain
> > an internal fork or rewrite from scratch. I'll take a look and see what
> we
> > can do.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --KW 8-)
> > --
> > Keith Wansbrough
> > he/him
> > PRINCIPAL SOFTWARE ENGINEER
> > Azure for Operators
> > Office: +44 131 662 1212
> > [email protected]
> > https://github.com/kw217
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matthew Benedict de Detrich <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 4:58 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: M0 release for incubator-pekko repo
> >
> > I agree with the sentiment that in general we should be focusing on
> > pekko-core (in any case it's necessary for all of the other pekko
> modules).
> >
> > As mentioned in my earlier email today pekko-core is in a good state to
> > work on right now, so it should be quite practical to split out the
> > mentioned work amongst the community. The main technical task to be done
> is
> > to figure out how migrating from an Akka to Pekko cluster would work.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > --
> > Matthew de Detrich
> > Aiven Deutschland GmbH
> > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
> > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
> > m: +491603708037
> > w: aiven.io e: [email protected] On 5. Jan 2023 at 16:16 +0100,
> > PJ Fanning <[email protected]>, wrote:
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I'm going to ignore that there are other pekko git repos. A lot of the
> > > same work needs to be done for those repos but it simplifies the
> > > conversation to ignore them in this thread. We can come back to them
> > > later.
> > >
> > > There has been good progress but there is a lot still to do. Some of
> > > the key issues remaining include.
> > > * getting the Apache license headers into the source files
> > > * getting the nightlies published
> > > * getting the doc site up
> > > * careful review of the docs to remove any remaining references to
> > > Lightbend or Akka (including logos)
> > > * new look and feel for the docs (just so they don't look exactly like
> > > the Akka ones)
> > > * review the automated test failures
> > > * source and binary distributions
> > > (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> > > hub.com%2Fapache%2Fincubator-pekko%2Fissues%2F78&data=05%7C01%7Ckeith.
> > > wansbrough%40microsoft.com%7C7fe1bf8cc3124e5f972808daef3e0352%7C72f988
> > > bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638085346898446381%7CUnknown%7CTW
> > > FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
> > > Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nkW09wiJ0vZMOSn%2FR7U8Gql%2FvC820cEaC7%2F
> > > XUdQjfM0%3D&reserved=0)
> > > * upgrade dependency jars if they have CVEs (unless we need to make
> > > major changes to facilitate the upgrade)
> > >
> > > Some of these tasks are in progress but most of the tasks could be
> > > taken on by willing volunteers.
> > >
> > > There may be an argument that we could try an early M0 or M1 release
> > > to allow outside lib maintainers and other interested parties to try
> > > out the new libs. There are probably not many of the items above that
> > > could be delayed to a later milstone though - possibly some of the doc
> > > and test tasks.
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Matthew de Detrich
>
> *Aiven Deutschland GmbH*
>
> Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin
>
> Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B
>
> Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen
>
> *m:* +491603708037
>
> *w:* aiven.io *e:* [email protected]
>

Reply via email to