On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> I wonder how many people actually take advantage of NameWithVirtualHost=1.
> seems that the PerlRun methodology (filenames) is a much cleaner solution
> that invites less problems/confusion.
using filenames makes for long packages names == lengthy lookups and more
memory than we need. at least the way it is currently implemented where
each '/' turns into '::'. could be that s,/,_,g is good enough, but
haven't thought about this for a while. in any case, we should get rid of
the NameWithVirtualHost stuff, its caused too many problems in the past.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
