On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > I wonder how many people actually take advantage of NameWithVirtualHost=1.
> > seems that the PerlRun methodology (filenames) is a much cleaner solution
> > that invites less problems/confusion.
>
> using filenames makes for long packages names == lengthy lookups and more
> memory than we need. at least the way it is currently implemented where
> each '/' turns into '::'. could be that s,/,_,g is good enough, but
> haven't thought about this for a while. in any case, we should get rid of
> the NameWithVirtualHost stuff, its caused too many problems in the past.
what's the replacement of NameWithVirtualHost? Obviously we need something
to distinguish between vhs.
_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://eXtropia.com/
http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
