[fixing the subject]

Steve Hay wrote:

Does the problem persist if you apply this patch (and re-run t/TEST -conf)? Most likely it'll go away, but this is not the right solution, just a sanity check.


I tried your patch (and test reconfiguration) too, but it doesn't make any difference -- it still crashes in the same place for the same reason.

Good, that was an important check to remove the guilt potential from the add_filter functions. So the cause is elsewhere.


I have found this, though:

Recall that running just the "filter" tests (as "perl t/TEST t/filter") makes it work (except for the in_str_consume test that sadly still fails).

Well, running "perl t/TEST t/api t/filter" also succeeds, as does "perl t/TEST t/apr t/filter" (except for apr/perlio, of course), but "perl t/TEST t/api t/apr t/filter" makes the first filter test -- both_str_con_add.t -- crash Apache.

You need to get t/SMOKE to work which will help you to find the guilty test which when run before filter/both_str_con_add causes the latter to fail. It's designed exactly for this purpose, besides its side effects which are useful for normal smoking.


It's much easier to debug when you have (hopefully) only 1 test to run before it fails (it's quite possible that there is a specific combination of running tests that lead to the problem). It'll also help me to understand what could be the cause, since even though you are very helpful at this remote debugging session, it's quite hard for me to be helpful to nail this problem down, without knowing where to look.

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to