Steve Hay wrote: [...]
If not, does reverting this patch makes the problem go away?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-cvs&m=106312839005459&w=2
If so, does it go away completely, or only when this test is run?
Yes - that fixes it completely!
Perfect.
All four of the short test sequences in my previous mail now pass, and, in fact with your patch for filter/in_str_consume.t in place as well, I now have the *entire* testsuite running successfully!
including ModPerl-Registry?
Yes.
Presumably you don't really want to retract Geoff's patch, though? I'll be happy to test any ammended version of it that you can come up with if you like.
Probably we will do that temporary if we go with the release shortly, unless we figure that out soonish. The problem is that it's really hard to debug virtually, I wish I could reproduce the problem on my side. It'd make my life much easier ;)
Did you see my comment about removing the subpool part from t/t/response/TestAPR/pool.pm "fixing" it?
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-dev&m=106424373602910&w=2)
Basically, this broke:
my $p = APR::Pool->new; my $subp = $p->new; $p->destroy;
but this worked:
my $p = APR::Pool->new; $p->destroy;
Dunno if there's anything in that.
- Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
