Steve Hay wrote:

Let's first look at the apr/pool issue, since it's a new stuff recently added by Geoff.

Does this make any difference?

Index: xs/APR/Pool/APR__Pool.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/xs/APR/Pool/APR__Pool.h,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 APR__Pool.h
--- xs/APR/Pool/APR__Pool.h     9 Sep 2003 17:22:39 -0000       1.6
+++ xs/APR/Pool/APR__Pool.h     23 Sep 2003 08:53:57 -0000
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
     /* mark the pool as being created via APR::Pool->new()
      * see mpxs_apr_pool_DESTROY */
     apr_pool_userdata_set((const void *)1, MP_APR_POOL_NEW,
-                          apr_pool_cleanup_null, newpool);
+                          NULL, newpool);

     return newpool;
 }

If not, does reverting this patch makes the problem go away?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-cvs&m=106312839005459&w=2

If so, does it go away completely, or only when this test is run?

__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to