>> stas, perrin had also mentioned the idea that since we were moving from >> Apache::OK to Apache2::OK (again with a virtual namespace) it might make >> more sense to use Apache::Const::OK instead. I guess that's lots of >> typing, >> but uses always have OK if they want. >> >> thoughts? > > > Sure, go for it.
and the same for APR::Const? APR::EBUSY would become APR::Const::EBUSY? --Geoff --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
