Geoffrey Young wrote:
stas, perrin had also mentioned the idea that since we were moving from
Apache::OK to Apache2::OK (again with a virtual namespace) it might make
more sense to use Apache::Const::OK instead. I guess that's lots of
typing,
but uses always have OK if they want.
thoughts?
Sure, go for it.
and the same for APR::Const? APR::EBUSY would become APR::Const::EBUSY?
Obviously :)
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
