Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
Which reminds me, it would be nice to have a bug/ test categorie for
such gems
that don't fit very nicely anywhere else.
This test fits perfectly into the main test suite. But yes, we need to
have a new directory for other tests. Long ago I've suggested t_extra.
Wasn't t_extra for the kind of developer's tests what would not be executed
unless we were building in maintainer-mode ?
No, it was for test that can't fit into the main test suite. e.g. test
that relay on a virgin configuration (I've posted at least 2 sub A-T based
tarballs recently, I could only reproduce the bug with a standalone config)
I was more thinking of a category of tests specifically to nail down known
bugs.
correct.
--
_____________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://stason.org/
MailChannels: Assured Messaging(TM) http://mailchannels.com/
The "Practical mod_perl" book http://modperlbook.org/
http://perl.apache.org/ http://perl.org/ http://logilune.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
