[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14349393#comment-14349393
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-1702:
---------------------------------------
Not crazy about the fix, but there are a couple of alternatives that would be
better IMHO:
- Ideally add a case statement in the necessary derived classes for the
PDataType.toObject(Object o, PDataType actualType) method when
actualType.isCoercibleTo(PVarChar.INSTANCE). This would just call through to
PDataType.toObject(String value), as we already have methods for each PDataType
that converts from a String to the Object. Ideally, we should have an abstract
PNumberDataType that has these type of methods so we don't have to repeat the
logic in each PDataType numeric concrete class (which wasn't possible before
Nick improved our type system).
- Less ideally, have an if statement like this in
PhoenixPreparedStatement.setObject() instead:
{code}
@@ -441,7 +442,11 @@ public class PhoenixPreparedStatement extends
PhoenixStatement implements Prepar
public void setObject(int parameterIndex, Object o, int targetSqlType)
throws SQLException {
PDataType targetType = PDataType.fromTypeId(targetSqlType);
PDataType sourceType = PDataType.fromLiteral(o);
- o = targetType.toObject(o, sourceType);
+ if ( !sourceType.isCoercibleTo(targetType) &&
sourceType.isCoercibleTo(PVarChar.INSTANCE)) {
+ o = targetType.toObject((String)o);
+ } else {
+ o = targetType.toObject(o, sourceType);
+ }
setParameter(parameterIndex, o);
}
{code}
> Allow Phoenix to be used from JMeter
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-1702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1702
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0.0, 4.2.3, 4.3.1
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-1702.00.patch
>
>
> Here's a simple patch to allow Phoenix to be invoked from jmeter. Perhaps it
> should be made more robust re: additional data types. I've been using this
> combination for some performance work recently.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
