[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15585113#comment-15585113
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-2890:
-----------------------------------------
Github user chrajeshbabu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/210#discussion_r83824633
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/mapreduce/index/IndexTool.java ---
@@ -85,7 +102,7 @@
private static final Option DATA_TABLE_OPTION = new Option("dt",
"data-table", true,
"Data table name (mandatory)");
private static final Option INDEX_TABLE_OPTION = new Option("it",
"index-table", true,
- "Index table name(mandatory)");
+ "Index table name(not required in case of partial
rebuilding)");
--- End diff --
Better to have an argument for partial rebuilding than go by rebuild if we
don't mention index table.
> Extend IndexTool to allow incremental index rebuilds
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-2890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2890
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ankit Singhal
> Assignee: Ankit Singhal
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.9.0
>
> Attachments: PHOENIX-2890.patch, PHOENIX-2890_wip.patch
>
>
> Currently , IndexTool is used for initial index rebuild but I think we should
> extend it to be used for recovering index from last disabled timestamp too.
> In general terms if we run IndexTool on already existing/new index, then it
> should follow the same semantics as followed by background Index rebuilding
> thread.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
