Thanks, Andrew. One question: are there users on 4.8.0 or 4.8.1 who would not want to upgrade to 4.9.0? We're in the voting stage for a 4.9.0 which has all the fixes in 4.8 branch (and more) and is compatible (as usual) with 4.8 releases through rolling restarts. At SFDC, we'll move to 4.9.0.
One thing is clear, though. Given PHOENIX-3407 (and HBASE-14465), users on HBase 1.2 should not use 4.8.0 or 4.8.1. Thanks, James On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Need help with making a 4.8.2? I could try my hand at making a Phoenix > release. > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:06 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Current plan is to have a 4.9.0 RC in that same timeframe (by 10/31) with > > the column encoding work (PHOENIX-1598 and PHOENIX-2565) and PHOENIX-6 > > (atomic insert/update). If it's too much much for you to do both 4.8.2 > and > > 4.9 simultaneously, I can volunteer to be the RM for 4.9. > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > we have 20 jiras against 4.8.2 some of which seem important enough ... > > and > > > over 200 against 4.9.0. > > > I think we should start keeping stable branches for longer.As before > I'll > > > volunteer doing 4.8.2 as well as a 4.9.0. > > > Let's think about a 4.8.2 in two weeks or so, unless there're vastly > > > different opinions. > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
