[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16094004#comment-16094004
]
James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-3525:
---------------------------------------
[~samarthjain] - this is the JIRA we were discussing. Rather than using the
timestamp at which the index was marked active, I'd lean toward adding a new
INDEX_ENABLED_TIMESTAMP instead so that we can handle the case of keeping the
index active.
> Cap automatic index rebuilding to inactive timestamp.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3525
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3525
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ankit Singhal
>
> From [[email protected]] review comment on
> https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/210
> For automatic rebuilding ,DISABLED_TIMESTAMP is lower bound but there is no
> upper bound so we are going rebuild all the new writes written after
> DISABLED_TIMESTAMP even though indexes updated properly. So we can introduce
> an upper bound of time where we are going to start a rebuild thread so we can
> limit the data to rebuild. In case If there are frequent writes then we can
> increment the rebuild period exponentially
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
