The vote has passed with three binding +1 votes (Viraj, Geoffrey, and
Rajeshbabu), and one non-binding +1 vote (Richard).
Thanks to everyone who has voted.
I will finish the release process shortly.

Istvan

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 9:21 AM [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1(binding)
>
> rat-check : Ok
> build : Ok
> checksum/signature : Ok.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Rajeshbabu.
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:54 AM Geoffrey Jacoby <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > rat-check: OK
> > Build with master + patch: OK
> > verified signature and checksum: OK
> >
> > Thanks for the help, Istvan!
> >
> > Geoffrey
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 12:47 PM Istvan Toth <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, Geoffrey, you need this patch for Phoenix:
> > > (it's old, possibly needs updating)
> > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1344
> > >
> > > That's why we've bumped the version to 2.0
> > >
> > > Istvan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 6:43 PM Geoffrey Jacoby <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > -1 (I'm happy to change my vote if I made a mistake somewhere )
> > > >
> > > > mvn clean apache-rat:check: OK
> > > > mvn clean install on phoenix-thirdparty: OK
> > > > mvn clean package from phoenix master branch with
> > > > phoenix.thirdparty.version changed to 2.0.0: FAILED
> > > >
> > > > I have about 10 build errors that all look similar to the following:
> > > >
> > > > PhoenixRuntime.java:[721,40] DefaultParser(boolean,java.lang.Boolean)
> > has
> > > > private access in
> > > > org.apache.phoenix.thirdparty.org.apache.commons.cli.DefaultParser
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I tried this on both a work laptop and a personal machine (the latter
> > > had a
> > > > fresh clone of phoenix and phoenix-thirdparty) with the same result.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm guessing this is related to going from our patched commons-cli
> back
> > > to
> > > > shading an official one?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Geoffrey
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:01 AM Viraj Jasani <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > * Signature/Checksum: ok
> > > > > * Rat check: ok
> > > > > * Build Phoenix master against RC: ok
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 1:05 PM, Istvan Toth <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote on this Apache Phoenix Thirdparty release candidate,
> > > > > > phoenix-thirdparty-2.0.0RC1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix thirdparty 2.0.0
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 2.0.0RC0:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://github.com/apache/phoenix-thirdparty/tree/2.0.0RC1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as
> > > CHANGES.md
> > > > > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-thirdparty-2.0.0RC1/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in the "orgapachephoenix-1244"
> > staging
> > > > > > repository at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Artifacts were signed with the 0x794433C7 key which can be found
> > in:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > To learn more about Apache Phoenix Thirdparty, please see
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   https://phoenix.apache.org/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Istvan
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *István Tóth* | Staff Software Engineer
> > > [email protected] <https://www.cloudera.com>
> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> > Cloudera
> > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> > > <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to