Planning to release Omid 1.1.1 release. Let me know if anything needs to be included in the release?
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:19 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Will spend sometime on those flaky tests Istvan and trigger the builds > manually. > > Thanks, > Rajeshbabu. > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 12:16 PM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I'm referring to the Phoenix release, not thirdparty or Omid. >> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 7:45 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > It would be great to get the tests more stable before the release. >> > It's currently 50-50 at best. >> > We even have an Unit Test that often fails for me. >> > >> > Istvan >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:52 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> >> Can you review and commit >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7142 first ? >> >> >> >> I think the guava variant change is significant enough to warrant at >> >> least a minor version bump. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:21 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Going to start the RC of phoenix-thirdparty please don't commit >> anything >> >>> to >> >>> it until further intimation. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Rajeshbabu. >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, 10:41 PM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > You can tune the test execution parallelism , but for the defaults >> 6 or >> >>> > more cores, and ~32GB of RAM+SWAP. >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:10 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > > Hello all >> >>> > > What minimum configuration does phoenix require to run all unit >> tests >> >>> > over? >> >>> > > >> >>> > > On 2023/12/07 01:41:16 Viraj Jasani wrote: >> >>> > > > Thank you Rajeshbabu! That would be great, I will be happy to >> help >> >>> > > whenever >> >>> > > > needed. >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> >>> > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > OMID-240 is committed. We can proceed with Omid release >> process. >> >>> > > > > Also, we need to start phoenix-thirdparty release as well. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > @Viraj >> >>> > > > > I would like to volunteer for the releases of thirdparty, omid >> >>> and >> >>> > > phoenix >> >>> > > > > 5.1.4. >> >>> > > > > If it's fine will start work in a couple of days. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > Thanks, >> >>> > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:23 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> >>> > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Hi Viraj, >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Am making a patch for OMID-240 once done we can start Omid >> >>> release. >> >>> > > Give >> >>> > > > > > me a day or two. >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Thanks, >> >>> > > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:54 AM Viraj Jasani < >> >>> vjas...@apache.org> >> >>> > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Just wanted to bump this up. Are we good for starting Omid >> >>> > release? >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:52 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> >>> > > > > >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > >> > Will look into it @Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> . >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks, >> >>> > > > > >> > Rajeshbabu. >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 3:18 PM Istvan Toth >> >>> > > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Regarding Omid, Lars has opened >> >>> > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-240, which >> >>> looks >> >>> > > quite >> >>> > > > > >> scary. >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > I am not against releasing a new Omid version that only >> >>> has >> >>> > CVE >> >>> > > > > fixes >> >>> > > > > >> and >> >>> > > > > >> > > component updates, >> >>> > > > > >> > > but I'd strongly suggest looking into OMID-240 right >> >>> after. >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 9:34 AM Nihal Jain < >> >>> > > nihaljain...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Hi >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Done as part of PHOENIX-7075. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> switch to standard guava in phoenix-thirdparty >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Raised PHOENIX-7080 for same. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> Omid repo also has several CVE related patches >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> fix all possible vulnerabilities >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Will analyse and see what else can be fixed for >> >>> phoenix-omid >> >>> > > in >> >>> > > > > next >> >>> > > > > >> > few >> >>> > > > > >> > > > days with OMID-252. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Will keep this thread updated. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Regards, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Nihal >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, 19 Oct, 2023, 10:51 rajeshb...@apache.org, < >> >>> > > > > >> > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Sure Istvan. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > We are setting up security scans and fix all >> possible >> >>> > > > > >> vulnerabilities >> >>> > > > > >> > > > ASAP. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Nihal Jain from our team looking into it. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 9:35 AM Istvan Toth >> >>> > > > > >> <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Regarding the guava update: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Since we're no longer supporting Java 7, we >> should >> >>> > switch >> >>> > > to >> >>> > > > > >> > standard >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > guava >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > in phoenix-thirdparty. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > The Omid repo also has several CVE related >> patches. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > It would be nice to release Omid 1.1.1 before >> >>> Phoenix >> >>> > > 5.1.4 to >> >>> > > > > >> make >> >>> > > > > >> > > use >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > of >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > them. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Istvan >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:35 AM >> >>> rajeshb...@apache.org < >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > Sure Istvan, am fine not delete old versions. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > We need to release phoenix-thirdparty fixing >> the >> >>> guava >> >>> > > > > >> > > vulnerability >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > and >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > make use here would be better. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > I would like to release it this weekend. If >> >>> required >> >>> > > will >> >>> > > > > >> start >> >>> > > > > >> > > > another >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > discussion thread or start release. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > @Visa we are trying to productionize the >> Phoenix >> >>> with >> >>> > > ACID >> >>> > > > > >> > > > compliance. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > We >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > are in the early stages. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 11:01 PM Viraj Jasani < >> >>> > > > > >> vjas...@apache.org> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sounds good Istvan, let’s keep the versions. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > And thank you so much for fixing broken >> >>> compilation >> >>> > > for >> >>> > > > > 2.1 >> >>> > > > > >> and >> >>> > > > > >> > > 2.2 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > versions: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1714 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:05 PM Istvan Toth >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I very much agree on the release. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I don't remember why we didn't bump the >> Omid >> >>> > > version in >> >>> > > > > >> 5.1 >> >>> > > > > >> > > after >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > it >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > was >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > released. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > If it doesn't break anything, then it's a >> good >> >>> > > thing. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I disagree on removing the old HBase >> version >> >>> > > support. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just as HBase doesn't remove support for >> old >> >>> > Hadoop >> >>> > > > > >> versions >> >>> > > > > >> > in >> >>> > > > > >> > > > new >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > patch >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > (or even minor) releases, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think it would be much kinder to our >> users >> >>> not >> >>> > to >> >>> > > > > force >> >>> > > > > >> > them >> >>> > > > > >> > > to >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > upgrade >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > HBase, when it really doesn't cost us >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > much to maintain support for the old >> versions. >> >>> > > (Even if >> >>> > > > > >> the >> >>> > > > > >> > > build >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > with >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2.1 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and 2.2 is broken now) >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think that we should make an effort to >> >>> increase >> >>> > > > > Phoenix >> >>> > > > > >> > > > adoption >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > beyond >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > SFDC and the CLDR customer base. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Making life easier for users of the Apache >> >>> > releases >> >>> > > by >> >>> > > > > not >> >>> > > > > >> > > > forcing >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > an >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > HBase >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > upgrade is a step in that direction. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regular releases are also something that >> >>> projects >> >>> > > the >> >>> > > > > >> image >> >>> > > > > >> > of >> >>> > > > > >> > > a >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > healthy >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > project. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: CLDR maintains an LTS release >> with >> >>> > > Phoenix >> >>> > > > > 5.1 >> >>> > > > > >> > and >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > HBase >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > 2.2, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > so it would make life a bit harder for us, >> >>> too. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Istvan >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:57 AM Viraj >> Jasani < >> >>> > > > > >> > > vjas...@apache.org >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the response, Rajeshbabu. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Sounds good. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Remove the support of HBase versions >> >>> <2.3.x >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Those versions are long EOL'ed so yes >> >>> perhaps it >> >>> > > makes >> >>> > > > > >> > sense >> >>> > > > > >> > > to >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > drop >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > their >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > support, though I am not sure if we need >> to >> >>> > manage >> >>> > > > > >> > > > compatibility >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > for >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > the >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > patch release. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > If we have consensus, it's fine to remove >> >>> them. >> >>> > No >> >>> > > > > >> strong >> >>> > > > > >> > > > opinion >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > either >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > way but I am slightly inclined to remove >> the >> >>> > > support >> >>> > > > > >> since >> >>> > > > > >> > > they >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > are >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > already >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > EOL'ed. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2.3 is also EOL'ed, but we should keep it >> >>> anyway >> >>> > > since >> >>> > > > > >> it >> >>> > > > > >> > > was a >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > stable >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release line for quite some time and some >> >>> users >> >>> > > might >> >>> > > > > >> still >> >>> > > > > >> > > be >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > using >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2.3.x >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > versions. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 9:38 PM >> >>> > > rajeshb...@apache.org >> >>> > > > > < >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > +1 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Would be better to do few things before >> >>> > release. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1) Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 2) Remove the support of HBase versions >> >>> <2.3.x >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > These would just backports . I will do >> it >> >>> if >> >>> > > it's >> >>> > > > > >> fine. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:14 AM Viraj >> >>> Jasani < >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > vjas...@apache.org >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > It's been almost a year since we had >> the >> >>> > last >> >>> > > > > patch >> >>> > > > > >> > > release >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > on >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > the >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 5.1 >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > release line. As discussed on other >> >>> threads, >> >>> > > 5.2 >> >>> > > > > >> > release >> >>> > > > > >> > > > can >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > wait a >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > little >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > longer for some of the features that >> >>> are in >> >>> > > > > >> progress. >> >>> > > > > >> > In >> >>> > > > > >> > > > the >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > meantime, >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > should also keep the 5.1 release line >> >>> > active. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > We have some good contributions on >> the >> >>> 5.1 >> >>> > > release >> >>> > > > > >> > line. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Unless >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > anyone >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > would like to be the RM for 5.1.4, I >> >>> would >> >>> > > > > >> volunteer to >> >>> > > > > >> > > > start >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > the >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > preparation early next week. >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [image: Cloudera] < >> https://www.cloudera.com/> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < >> >>> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > [image: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] < >> >>> > > > > https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > [image: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cloudera >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > on LinkedIn] < >> >>> > > https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < >> >>> > > https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> >>> > > > > >> > [image: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] < >> >>> > https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> >>> > > > > >> [image: >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Cloudera >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > on LinkedIn] < >> >>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > -- >> >>> > > > > >> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> >>> > > > > >> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> >>> > > > > >> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> >>> > > > > >> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> >>> > > > > >> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < >> >>> https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> >>> > > [image: >> >>> > > > > >> > > Cloudera on Facebook] < >> https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> >>> > > [image: >> >>> > > > > >> > Cloudera >> >>> > > > > >> > > on LinkedIn] < >> https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> >> >>> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------ >> >>> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------ >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> >>> > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> >>> > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> >>> > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> >>> > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: >> >>> > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: >> >>> Cloudera >> >>> > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> >> >>> > ------------------------------ >> >>> > ------------------------------ >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> >
