Facing an issue while deploying hbase build with hadoop 3 while making RC of phoenix-omid.
Command: /home/rajeshbabu/phoenix-rm/release-build.sh publish-release Log file: publish-release.log Command FAILED. Check full logs for details. 03:10:04 [INFO] Apache HBase - Archetype builder ................... SUCCESS [ 0.508 s] 03:10:04 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 03:10:04 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS 03:10:04 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 03:10:04 [INFO] Total time: 04:42 min 03:10:04 [INFO] Finished at: 2024-01-05T03:10:04Z 03:10:04 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ mvn -B --settings /home/rajeshbabu/phoenix-rm/output/phoenix-repo-WdFTA/tmp-settings.xml -DskipTests -Dcheckstyle.skip=true -DaltDeploymentRepository=dryrun::default::file:///home/rajeshbabu/phoenix-rm/output/phoenix-omid.deploy -P apache-release,release clean deploy Logging to /home/rajeshbabu/phoenix-rm/output/mvn_deploy_release.log. This will take a while... Error: Deploy build failed, for details see log at '/home/rajeshbabu/phoenix-rm/output/mvn_deploy_release.log'. ======================== === Release Cleanup details in cleanup.log Looking into the scripts. Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:36 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Istvan. > > Going to make RC0 now. > > > Thanks, > Rajeshbabu. > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 2:26 PM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I'm not aware of known blockers. >> >> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:31 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Planning to release Omid 1.1.1 release. Let me know if anything needs >> to be >> > included in the release? >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:19 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Will spend sometime on those flaky tests Istvan and trigger the builds >> > > manually. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Rajeshbabu. >> > > >> > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 12:16 PM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > >> I'm referring to the Phoenix release, not thirdparty or Omid. >> > >> >> > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 7:45 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > It would be great to get the tests more stable before the release. >> > >> > It's currently 50-50 at best. >> > >> > We even have an Unit Test that often fails for me. >> > >> > >> > >> > Istvan >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:52 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> >> Can you review and commit >> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7142 first ? >> > >> >> >> > >> >> I think the guava variant change is significant enough to warrant >> at >> > >> >> least a minor version bump. >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:21 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> > >> >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >>> Going to start the RC of phoenix-thirdparty please don't commit >> > >> anything >> > >> >>> to >> > >> >>> it until further intimation. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> Thanks, >> > >> >>> Rajeshbabu. >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, 10:41 PM Istvan Toth >> > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > >> > >> > >> >>> wrote: >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > You can tune the test execution parallelism , but for the >> defaults >> > >> 6 or >> > >> >>> > more cores, and ~32GB of RAM+SWAP. >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:10 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > > Hello all >> > >> >>> > > What minimum configuration does phoenix require to run all >> unit >> > >> tests >> > >> >>> > over? >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > On 2023/12/07 01:41:16 Viraj Jasani wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > Thank you Rajeshbabu! That would be great, I will be happy >> to >> > >> help >> > >> >>> > > whenever >> > >> >>> > > > needed. >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> > >> >>> > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > OMID-240 is committed. We can proceed with Omid release >> > >> process. >> > >> >>> > > > > Also, we need to start phoenix-thirdparty release as >> well. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > @Viraj >> > >> >>> > > > > I would like to volunteer for the releases of thirdparty, >> > omid >> > >> >>> and >> > >> >>> > > phoenix >> > >> >>> > > > > 5.1.4. >> > >> >>> > > > > If it's fine will start work in a couple of days. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > Thanks, >> > >> >>> > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:23 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < >> > >> >>> > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > Hi Viraj, >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > Am making a patch for OMID-240 once done we can start >> Omid >> > >> >>> release. >> > >> >>> > > Give >> > >> >>> > > > > > me a day or two. >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > Thanks, >> > >> >>> > > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:54 AM Viraj Jasani < >> > >> >>> vjas...@apache.org> >> > >> >>> > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> Just wanted to bump this up. Are we good for starting >> > Omid >> > >> >>> > release? >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:52 PM rajeshb...@apache.org >> < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Will look into it @Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> >> . >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Rajeshbabu. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 3:18 PM Istvan Toth >> > >> >>> > > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Regarding Omid, Lars has opened >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-240, >> > which >> > >> >>> looks >> > >> >>> > > quite >> > >> >>> > > > > >> scary. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > I am not against releasing a new Omid version that >> > only >> > >> >>> has >> > >> >>> > CVE >> > >> >>> > > > > fixes >> > >> >>> > > > > >> and >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > component updates, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > but I'd strongly suggest looking into OMID-240 >> right >> > >> >>> after. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 9:34 AM Nihal Jain < >> > >> >>> > > nihaljain...@gmail.com> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Hi >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Done as part of PHOENIX-7075. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> switch to standard guava in >> phoenix-thirdparty >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Raised PHOENIX-7080 for same. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> Omid repo also has several CVE related >> patches >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> fix all possible vulnerabilities >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Will analyse and see what else can be fixed for >> > >> >>> phoenix-omid >> > >> >>> > > in >> > >> >>> > > > > next >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > few >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > days with OMID-252. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Will keep this thread updated. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Nihal >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, 19 Oct, 2023, 10:51 >> rajeshb...@apache.org, >> > < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Sure Istvan. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > We are setting up security scans and fix all >> > >> possible >> > >> >>> > > > > >> vulnerabilities >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > ASAP. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Nihal Jain from our team looking into it. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 9:35 AM Istvan Toth >> > >> >>> > > > > >> <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Regarding the guava update: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Since we're no longer supporting Java 7, we >> > >> should >> > >> >>> > switch >> > >> >>> > > to >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > standard >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > guava >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > in phoenix-thirdparty. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > The Omid repo also has several CVE related >> > >> patches. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > It would be nice to release Omid 1.1.1 >> before >> > >> >>> Phoenix >> > >> >>> > > 5.1.4 to >> > >> >>> > > > > >> make >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > use >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > of >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > them. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Istvan >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:35 AM >> > >> >>> rajeshb...@apache.org < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > Sure Istvan, am fine not delete old >> versions. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > We need to release phoenix-thirdparty >> fixing >> > >> the >> > >> >>> guava >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > vulnerability >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > and >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > make use here would be better. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > I would like to release it this weekend. >> If >> > >> >>> required >> > >> >>> > > will >> > >> >>> > > > > >> start >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > another >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > discussion thread or start release. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > @Visa we are trying to productionize the >> > >> Phoenix >> > >> >>> with >> > >> >>> > > ACID >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > compliance. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > We >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > are in the early stages. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 11:01 PM Viraj >> Jasani < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> vjas...@apache.org> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sounds good Istvan, let’s keep the >> > versions. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > And thank you so much for fixing broken >> > >> >>> compilation >> > >> >>> > > for >> > >> >>> > > > > 2.1 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> and >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > 2.2 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > versions: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1714 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:05 PM Istvan >> > Toth >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I very much agree on the release. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I don't remember why we didn't bump >> the >> > >> Omid >> > >> >>> > > version in >> > >> >>> > > > > >> 5.1 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > after >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > it >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > was >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > released. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > If it doesn't break anything, then >> it's a >> > >> good >> > >> >>> > > thing. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I disagree on removing the old HBase >> > >> version >> > >> >>> > > support. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just as HBase doesn't remove support >> for >> > >> old >> > >> >>> > Hadoop >> > >> >>> > > > > >> versions >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > in >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > new >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > patch >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > (or even minor) releases, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think it would be much kinder to our >> > >> users >> > >> >>> not >> > >> >>> > to >> > >> >>> > > > > force >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > them >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > to >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > upgrade >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > HBase, when it really doesn't cost us >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > much to maintain support for the old >> > >> versions. >> > >> >>> > > (Even if >> > >> >>> > > > > >> the >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > build >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > with >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2.1 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and 2.2 is broken now) >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think that we should make an effort >> to >> > >> >>> increase >> > >> >>> > > > > Phoenix >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > adoption >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > beyond >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > SFDC and the CLDR customer base. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Making life easier for users of the >> > Apache >> > >> >>> > releases >> > >> >>> > > by >> > >> >>> > > > > not >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > forcing >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > an >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > HBase >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > upgrade is a step in that direction. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regular releases are also something >> that >> > >> >>> projects >> > >> >>> > > the >> > >> >>> > > > > >> image >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > of >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > a >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > healthy >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > project. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: CLDR maintains an LTS >> release >> > >> with >> > >> >>> > > Phoenix >> > >> >>> > > > > 5.1 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > and >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > HBase >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > 2.2, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > so it would make life a bit harder for >> > us, >> > >> >>> too. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Istvan >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:57 AM Viraj >> > >> Jasani < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > vjas...@apache.org >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the response, >> Rajeshbabu. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Sounds good. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Remove the support of HBase >> versions >> > >> >>> <2.3.x >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Those versions are long EOL'ed so >> yes >> > >> >>> perhaps it >> > >> >>> > > makes >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > sense >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > to >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > drop >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > their >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > support, though I am not sure if we >> > need >> > >> to >> > >> >>> > manage >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > compatibility >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > for >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > the >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > patch release. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > If we have consensus, it's fine to >> > remove >> > >> >>> them. >> > >> >>> > No >> > >> >>> > > > > >> strong >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > opinion >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > either >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > way but I am slightly inclined to >> > remove >> > >> the >> > >> >>> > > support >> > >> >>> > > > > >> since >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > they >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > are >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > already >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > EOL'ed. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2.3 is also EOL'ed, but we should >> keep >> > it >> > >> >>> anyway >> > >> >>> > > since >> > >> >>> > > > > >> it >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > was a >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > stable >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release line for quite some time and >> > some >> > >> >>> users >> > >> >>> > > might >> > >> >>> > > > > >> still >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > be >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > using >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2.3.x >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > versions. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 9:38 PM >> > >> >>> > > rajeshb...@apache.org >> > >> >>> > > > > < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > +1 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Would be better to do few things >> > before >> > >> >>> > release. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1) Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 2) Remove the support of HBase >> > versions >> > >> >>> <2.3.x >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > These would just backports . I >> will >> > do >> > >> it >> > >> >>> if >> > >> >>> > > it's >> > >> >>> > > > > >> fine. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:14 AM >> Viraj >> > >> >>> Jasani < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > vjas...@apache.org >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > It's been almost a year since we >> > had >> > >> the >> > >> >>> > last >> > >> >>> > > > > patch >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > release >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > on >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > the >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 5.1 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > release line. As discussed on >> other >> > >> >>> threads, >> > >> >>> > > 5.2 >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > release >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > can >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > wait a >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > little >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > longer for some of the features >> > that >> > >> >>> are in >> > >> >>> > > > > >> progress. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > In >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > the >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > meantime, >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > should also keep the 5.1 release >> > line >> > >> >>> > active. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > We have some good contributions >> on >> > >> the >> > >> >>> 5.1 >> > >> >>> > > release >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > line. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Unless >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > anyone >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > would like to be the RM for >> 5.1.4, >> > I >> > >> >>> would >> > >> >>> > > > > >> volunteer to >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > start >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > the >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > preparation early next week. >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software >> > Engineer >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > cloudera.com < >> https://www.cloudera.com> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [image: Cloudera] < >> > >> https://www.cloudera.com/> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < >> > >> >>> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > [image: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] < >> > >> >>> > > > > https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > [image: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cloudera >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > on LinkedIn] < >> > >> >>> > > https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > [image: Cloudera] < >> https://www.cloudera.com/> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < >> > >> >>> > > https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > [image: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] < >> > >> >>> > https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> [image: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Cloudera >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > on LinkedIn] < >> > >> >>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > -- >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < >> > >> >>> https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > [image: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Cloudera on Facebook] < >> > >> https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > [image: >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Cloudera >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > on LinkedIn] < >> > >> https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > >> >>> > > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > -- >> > >> >>> > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> > >> >>> > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> > >> >>> > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> > >> >>> > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> > >> >>> > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> >> > [image: >> > >> >>> > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> >> [image: >> > >> >>> Cloudera >> > >> >>> > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> >> > >> >>> > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > ------------------------------ >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
