I'm not aware of known blockers. On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:31 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Planning to release Omid 1.1.1 release. Let me know if anything needs to be > included in the release? > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 8:19 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Will spend sometime on those flaky tests Istvan and trigger the builds > > manually. > > > > Thanks, > > Rajeshbabu. > > > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 12:16 PM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> I'm referring to the Phoenix release, not thirdparty or Omid. > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 7:45 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > It would be great to get the tests more stable before the release. > >> > It's currently 50-50 at best. > >> > We even have an Unit Test that often fails for me. > >> > > >> > Istvan > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 6:52 AM Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Can you review and commit > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-7142 first ? > >> >> > >> >> I think the guava variant change is significant enough to warrant at > >> >> least a minor version bump. > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 5:21 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > >> >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Going to start the RC of phoenix-thirdparty please don't commit > >> anything > >> >>> to > >> >>> it until further intimation. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks, > >> >>> Rajeshbabu. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2023, 10:41 PM Istvan Toth > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid > >> > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > You can tune the test execution parallelism , but for the defaults > >> 6 or > >> >>> > more cores, and ~32GB of RAM+SWAP. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 4:10 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Hello all > >> >>> > > What minimum configuration does phoenix require to run all unit > >> tests > >> >>> > over? > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > On 2023/12/07 01:41:16 Viraj Jasani wrote: > >> >>> > > > Thank you Rajeshbabu! That would be great, I will be happy to > >> help > >> >>> > > whenever > >> >>> > > > needed. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:37 AM rajeshb...@apache.org < > >> >>> > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > OMID-240 is committed. We can proceed with Omid release > >> process. > >> >>> > > > > Also, we need to start phoenix-thirdparty release as well. > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > @Viraj > >> >>> > > > > I would like to volunteer for the releases of thirdparty, > omid > >> >>> and > >> >>> > > phoenix > >> >>> > > > > 5.1.4. > >> >>> > > > > If it's fine will start work in a couple of days. > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Thanks, > >> >>> > > > > Rajeshbabu. > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 4:23 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < > >> >>> > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Hi Viraj, > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Am making a patch for OMID-240 once done we can start Omid > >> >>> release. > >> >>> > > Give > >> >>> > > > > > me a day or two. > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > Thanks, > >> >>> > > > > > Rajeshbabu. > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 2:54 AM Viraj Jasani < > >> >>> vjas...@apache.org> > >> >>> > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> Just wanted to bump this up. Are we good for starting > Omid > >> >>> > release? > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:52 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < > >> >>> > > > > >> chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > Will look into it @Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> . > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks, > >> >>> > > > > >> > Rajeshbabu. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 3:18 PM Istvan Toth > >> >>> > > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Regarding Omid, Lars has opened > >> >>> > > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-240, > which > >> >>> looks > >> >>> > > quite > >> >>> > > > > >> scary. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > I am not against releasing a new Omid version that > only > >> >>> has > >> >>> > CVE > >> >>> > > > > fixes > >> >>> > > > > >> and > >> >>> > > > > >> > > component updates, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > but I'd strongly suggest looking into OMID-240 right > >> >>> after. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 9:34 AM Nihal Jain < > >> >>> > > nihaljain...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > >> > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Hi > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Done as part of PHOENIX-7075. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> switch to standard guava in phoenix-thirdparty > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Raised PHOENIX-7080 for same. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> Omid repo also has several CVE related patches > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> fix all possible vulnerabilities > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Will analyse and see what else can be fixed for > >> >>> phoenix-omid > >> >>> > > in > >> >>> > > > > next > >> >>> > > > > >> > few > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > days with OMID-252. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Will keep this thread updated. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Regards, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > Nihal > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, 19 Oct, 2023, 10:51 rajeshb...@apache.org, > < > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Sure Istvan. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > We are setting up security scans and fix all > >> possible > >> >>> > > > > >> vulnerabilities > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > ASAP. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Nihal Jain from our team looking into it. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Rajeshbabu. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 9:35 AM Istvan Toth > >> >>> > > > > >> <st...@cloudera.com.invalid > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Regarding the guava update: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Since we're no longer supporting Java 7, we > >> should > >> >>> > switch > >> >>> > > to > >> >>> > > > > >> > standard > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > guava > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > in phoenix-thirdparty. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > The Omid repo also has several CVE related > >> patches. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > It would be nice to release Omid 1.1.1 before > >> >>> Phoenix > >> >>> > > 5.1.4 to > >> >>> > > > > >> make > >> >>> > > > > >> > > use > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > of > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > them. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Istvan > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:35 AM > >> >>> rajeshb...@apache.org < > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > Sure Istvan, am fine not delete old versions. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > We need to release phoenix-thirdparty fixing > >> the > >> >>> guava > >> >>> > > > > >> > > vulnerability > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > and > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > make use here would be better. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > I would like to release it this weekend. If > >> >>> required > >> >>> > > will > >> >>> > > > > >> start > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > another > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > discussion thread or start release. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > @Visa we are trying to productionize the > >> Phoenix > >> >>> with > >> >>> > > ACID > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > compliance. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > We > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > are in the early stages. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023, 11:01 PM Viraj Jasani < > >> >>> > > > > >> vjas...@apache.org> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sounds good Istvan, let’s keep the > versions. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > And thank you so much for fixing broken > >> >>> compilation > >> >>> > > for > >> >>> > > > > 2.1 > >> >>> > > > > >> and > >> >>> > > > > >> > > 2.2 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > versions: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/1714 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:05 PM Istvan > Toth > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > <st...@cloudera.com.invalid > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I very much agree on the release. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I don't remember why we didn't bump the > >> Omid > >> >>> > > version in > >> >>> > > > > >> 5.1 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > after > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > it > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > was > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > released. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > If it doesn't break anything, then it's a > >> good > >> >>> > > thing. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I disagree on removing the old HBase > >> version > >> >>> > > support. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Just as HBase doesn't remove support for > >> old > >> >>> > Hadoop > >> >>> > > > > >> versions > >> >>> > > > > >> > in > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > new > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > patch > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > (or even minor) releases, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think it would be much kinder to our > >> users > >> >>> not > >> >>> > to > >> >>> > > > > force > >> >>> > > > > >> > them > >> >>> > > > > >> > > to > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > upgrade > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > HBase, when it really doesn't cost us > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > much to maintain support for the old > >> versions. > >> >>> > > (Even if > >> >>> > > > > >> the > >> >>> > > > > >> > > build > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > with > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2.1 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > and 2.2 is broken now) > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think that we should make an effort to > >> >>> increase > >> >>> > > > > Phoenix > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > adoption > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > beyond > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > SFDC and the CLDR customer base. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Making life easier for users of the > Apache > >> >>> > releases > >> >>> > > by > >> >>> > > > > not > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > forcing > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > an > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > HBase > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > upgrade is a step in that direction. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Regular releases are also something that > >> >>> projects > >> >>> > > the > >> >>> > > > > >> image > >> >>> > > > > >> > of > >> >>> > > > > >> > > a > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > healthy > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > project. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: CLDR maintains an LTS release > >> with > >> >>> > > Phoenix > >> >>> > > > > 5.1 > >> >>> > > > > >> > and > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > HBase > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > 2.2, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > so it would make life a bit harder for > us, > >> >>> too. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Istvan > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 6:57 AM Viraj > >> Jasani < > >> >>> > > > > >> > > vjas...@apache.org > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for the response, Rajeshbabu. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Sounds good. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Remove the support of HBase versions > >> >>> <2.3.x > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Those versions are long EOL'ed so yes > >> >>> perhaps it > >> >>> > > makes > >> >>> > > > > >> > sense > >> >>> > > > > >> > > to > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > drop > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > their > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > support, though I am not sure if we > need > >> to > >> >>> > manage > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > compatibility > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > for > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > the > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > patch release. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > If we have consensus, it's fine to > remove > >> >>> them. > >> >>> > No > >> >>> > > > > >> strong > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > opinion > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > either > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > way but I am slightly inclined to > remove > >> the > >> >>> > > support > >> >>> > > > > >> since > >> >>> > > > > >> > > they > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > are > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > already > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > EOL'ed. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2.3 is also EOL'ed, but we should keep > it > >> >>> anyway > >> >>> > > since > >> >>> > > > > >> it > >> >>> > > > > >> > > was a > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > stable > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release line for quite some time and > some > >> >>> users > >> >>> > > might > >> >>> > > > > >> still > >> >>> > > > > >> > > be > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > using > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2.3.x > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > versions. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 9:38 PM > >> >>> > > rajeshb...@apache.org > >> >>> > > > > < > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > +1 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Would be better to do few things > before > >> >>> > release. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 1) Bump up Omid to 1.1.0 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > 2) Remove the support of HBase > versions > >> >>> <2.3.x > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > These would just backports . I will > do > >> it > >> >>> if > >> >>> > > it's > >> >>> > > > > >> fine. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 9:14 AM Viraj > >> >>> Jasani < > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > vjas...@apache.org > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > It's been almost a year since we > had > >> the > >> >>> > last > >> >>> > > > > patch > >> >>> > > > > >> > > release > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > on > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > the > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 5.1 > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > release line. As discussed on other > >> >>> threads, > >> >>> > > 5.2 > >> >>> > > > > >> > release > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > can > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > wait a > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > little > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > longer for some of the features > that > >> >>> are in > >> >>> > > > > >> progress. > >> >>> > > > > >> > In > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > the > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > meantime, > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > we > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > should also keep the 5.1 release > line > >> >>> > active. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > We have some good contributions on > >> the > >> >>> 5.1 > >> >>> > > release > >> >>> > > > > >> > line. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Unless > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > anyone > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > would like to be the RM for 5.1.4, > I > >> >>> would > >> >>> > > > > >> volunteer to > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > start > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > the > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > release > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > preparation early next week. > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software > Engineer > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [image: Cloudera] < > >> https://www.cloudera.com/> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < > >> >>> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/cloudera> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > [image: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] < > >> >>> > > > > https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > [image: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cloudera > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > on LinkedIn] < > >> >>> > > https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < > >> >>> > > https://twitter.com/cloudera> > >> >>> > > > > >> > [image: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] < > >> >>> > https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> > >> >>> > > > > >> [image: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > Cloudera > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > on LinkedIn] < > >> >>> https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > -- > >> >>> > > > > >> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer > >> >>> > > > > >> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com > >> >>> > > > > >> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] < > >> >>> https://twitter.com/cloudera> > >> >>> > > [image: > >> >>> > > > > >> > > Cloudera on Facebook] < > >> https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> > >> >>> > > [image: > >> >>> > > > > >> > Cloudera > >> >>> > > > > >> > > on LinkedIn] < > >> https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> > >> >>> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > > > >> > > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > > > >> > > > >> >>> > > > > >> > > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer > >> >>> > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com > >> >>> > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> > >> >>> > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> > >> >>> > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> > [image: > >> >>> > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: > >> >>> Cloudera > >> >>> > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> > >> >>> > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > ------------------------------ > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >
