> On Aug. 14, 2013, 2:13 a.m., Cheolsoo Park wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestGrunt.java, > > line 1083 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/13535/diff/2/?file=340613#file340613line1083> > > > > I believe we shouldn't remove xargs. It was added by PIG-3099 to avoid > > some race condition. > > Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > I think it was a mistake. The test fails even before this patch with > xargs. The touch command will not produce any output. So it does not make > sense to have xargs after a touch.
You're right. Thanks for the clarification! > On Aug. 14, 2013, 2:13 a.m., Cheolsoo Park wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestPigServer.java, > > line 776 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/13535/diff/2/?file=340614#file340614line776> > > > > This is a bit confusing to me. 10 - 4 + 6 = 12, but numTimesInitiated > > is set to 10. > > > > _testSkipParseInRegisterForBatch(false, 10, 4); > > Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > It is 10 (4 + 6). Will change the hyphen to full stop so that it is not > mistaken as minus. I see. Thanks! Btw, why are there 7 function calls instead of 6? Is this a typo? 6 (parseAndBuild, launchPlan->RandomSampleLoader, InputSizeReducerEstimator, getSplits->RandomSampleLoader, createRecordReader->RandomSampleLoader, getSplits, createRecordReader) > On Aug. 14, 2013, 2:13 a.m., Cheolsoo Park wrote: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestPigServer.java, > > lines 804-805 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/13535/diff/2/?file=340614#file340614line804> > > > > If I understand correctly, this is equivalent to calling the followings: > > > > GruntParser grunt = new GruntParser(in); > > grunt.setInteractive(false); > > grunt.setParams(pigServer); > > grunt.parseStopOnError(false); //batch > > > > Can you explicitly call them, so it will be easier to identify the > > difference when skipParseInRegisterForBatch is on and off? > > Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > I added a comment. Left it at grunt.exec() as script execution from > Main.java is through that call and if anything changes in that method would > reflect in this test. Sure, sounds good. - Cheolsoo ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13535/#review25098 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 13, 2013, 2:34 p.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/13535/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 13, 2013, 2:34 p.m.) > > > Review request for pig. > > > Bugs: PIG-3204 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3204 > > > Repository: pig > > > Description > ------- > > Change parsing from line by line to whole script at once. > > > Diffs > ----- > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/PigServer.java > 1510960 > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/src/org/apache/pig/tools/grunt/GruntParser.java > 1510960 > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestGrunt.java > 1510960 > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pig/trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestPigServer.java > 1510960 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13535/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > New unit tests added to track the number of times a line is parsed. TestGrunt > and TestShortcuts test failures fixed. > > > Thanks, > > Rohini Palaniswamy > >
