Getting a travis build error for RAT, any ideas ? I am not seeing this locally.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.11:check (default) on project pirk: Too many files with unapproved license: 1 See RAT report in: /home/travis/build/apache/incubator-pirk/target/rat.txt -> [Help 1] On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: > ... I am also gonna disable Jdk 7 jobs on travis as part of this change. > > OK with @here ? > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Let's go with Option 1, i can modify .travis.yml to account for Maven 3.3x >> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 22 July 2016 at 22:13, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Within NiFi we went with the "oldest version of Maven we could fairly >>> > easily support" approach. I really wish we had not. >>> > >>> > As a new project you have one shot to set some of the fundamentals >>> > down right such as the JVM you're tied to or the Maven build >>> > environment and such. I recommend, picking the most forward leaning >>> > one you think you'll need. It is really easy to install the latest >>> > version of Maven >>> >>> >>> Just checking I'm not missing something about installing the latest >>> version >>> of Maven on Travis. >>> >>> A quick search shows we need to either script the download of a later >>> version [1], or a seemingly better option is to define the entire build >>> env >>> using Docker[2]. >>> >>> [1] >>> >>> http://binkley.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/struggling-with-travis-ci-and-maven-33.html >>> [2] >>> >>> http://blog.javabien.net/2015/08/21/travis-ci-on-a-java-project-with-docker-support/ >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >>> > but it is really non-trivial if you're doing >>> > interesting things with Maven to maintain support over long periods of >>> > time for behaviors of older versions. >>> > >>> > I'd seriously recommend you take the latest Maven release and call >>> > that the Maven version. That is purely a recommendation. I'll help >>> > whatever path is the consensus. >>> > >>> >> >> >
