Could it be that the .travis.yml needs a license header, that's the only
one without a header.



On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Suneel
>
> It is probably a good idea to keep it there because it can really help
> with automating some of the checks as people put in PRs.
>
> I'm happy to help do licensing/header hunting soon.
>
> Thanks
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > We r good now, I disabled the rat check to get past the build failure, i
> > guess we don't need that for travis, do we?
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Getting a travis build error for RAT, any ideas ? I am not seeing this
> >> locally.
> >>
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.11:check
> >> (default) on project pirk: Too many files with unapproved license: 1 See
> >> RAT report in: /home/travis/build/apache/incubator-pirk/target/rat.txt
> ->
> >> [Help 1]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ... I am also gonna disable Jdk 7 jobs on travis as part of this
> change.
> >>>
> >>> OK with  @here ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Let's go with Option 1, i can modify .travis.yml to account for Maven
> >>>> 3.3x
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 22 July 2016 at 22:13, Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Within NiFi we went with the "oldest version of Maven we could
> fairly
> >>>>> > easily support" approach.  I really wish we had not.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > As a new project you have one shot to set some of the fundamentals
> >>>>> > down right such as the JVM you're tied to or the Maven build
> >>>>> > environment and such.  I recommend, picking the most forward
> leaning
> >>>>> > one you think you'll need.  It is really easy to install the latest
> >>>>> > version of Maven
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just checking I'm not missing something about installing the latest
> >>>>> version
> >>>>> of Maven on Travis.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A quick search shows we need to either script the download of a later
> >>>>> version [1], or a seemingly better option is to define the entire
> build
> >>>>> env
> >>>>> using Docker[2].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://binkley.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/struggling-with-travis-ci-and-maven-33.html
> >>>>> [2]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> http://blog.javabien.net/2015/08/21/travis-ci-on-a-java-project-with-docker-support/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Tim
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > but it is really non-trivial if you're doing
> >>>>> > interesting things with Maven to maintain support over long
> periods of
> >>>>> > time for behaviors of older versions.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > I'd seriously recommend you take the latest Maven release and call
> >>>>> > that the Maven version.  That is purely a recommendation.  I'll
> help
> >>>>> > whatever path is the consensus.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to