On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 19/08/16 15:53, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> > wrote: > <snip> > >> I'd appreciate other mentors' close review of these built artefacts too. > >> > >> Seems that the main project source release looks good, but the > >> convenience JARs still needs some filtering/moving work. > > > > Anything else you can think of. Not sure how much of this can be > addressed > > in this release. Its best to acknowledge the remaining license issues > that > > need to be addressed and move forward with cutting a release. > > > > There just doesn't seem a clean way to get all of this straightened out > for > > the very first release, its possible that the way we are packaging the > > artifacts now may not be the right way and we need to do it differently, > > something that we had not considered or talked about so far. > > The main release artefact (apache-pirk-0.0.2-source-release.zip) is > looking good. I think there is a good argument to publish this as the > first project release, and work on the convenience binaries to be > included with the next release. > I can confirm that the logs/ are being packaged into the sources.zip and need to be excluded when building that artifact. I'll take a stab at this. > > It may be that the content of the next release is primarily the > inclusion of the convenience binaries, and it happens within a few > weeks. I don't see a problem with that. > > However, Ellison Anne was up for tackling the L&N's this time around, so > I'm not going to stand in the way of that. There's no rush. > > Regards, > Tim > >
