Hi Chris, doesn’t sound to good but I think we will sort it out. IMHO: If the site isn’t too of we can live with that for the time being.
Sebastian > Am 09.07.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > > Hi all, > > > > Right now I think we could stick with the not-that-pretty new skin and > eventually have that as a low hanging fruit for potential new committers. > > The current site does have its disadvantages: > > - Menus not working well on mobile devices > > - The structure of the page doesn't seem to pop the eve of someone surfing by. > > > > Chris > > > > > > Am 09.07.18, 09:47 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think we have a little problem with our site-generation. It wasn’t a > problem till yesterday. > > The maven guys released the version 20 of the maven apache root pom. > > > > I just tried building with this and now the site generation is failing. > > > > > > The general problem is that our current site skin is using an old version > of doxia. This seems to be incompatible with the recent site plugin version. > > > > The problem is, that we are not allowed to release if not using the latest > apache parent pom. So before being able to fix this, we are required to fix > this problem. > > > > I already started a feature branch tackling this problem some time ago. > The only problem with this is, that it produces a technically correct > website, but it looks really ugly. > > > > Anyone here have a few cycles to beautify the site generation? It’s on the > feature/site-generation-fixes branch. > > > > Chris > > > >
