Hi All,
I would propose a different approach. As I'm having 2,5 weeks off for holidays.
I am planning on really pausing the protocol implementation work for some time
as I really need some time off.
But ... I am planning on working a little on my web-design mojo and will start
working a little on the updated site.
Chris
Am 09.07.18, 19:16 schrieb "Sebastian Rühl"
<sebastian.ruehl...@googlemail.com.INVALID>:
Hi Chris,
doesn’t sound to good but I think we will sort it out.
IMHO: If the site isn’t too of we can live with that for the time being.
Sebastian
> Am 09.07.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Christofer Dutz
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Right now I think we could stick with the not-that-pretty new skin and
eventually have that as a low hanging fruit for potential new committers.
>
> The current site does have its disadvantages:
>
> - Menus not working well on mobile devices
>
> - The structure of the page doesn't seem to pop the eve of someone
surfing by.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 09.07.18, 09:47 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I think we have a little problem with our site-generation. It wasn’t a
problem till yesterday.
>
> The maven guys released the version 20 of the maven apache root pom.
>
>
>
> I just tried building with this and now the site generation is failing.
>
>
>
>
>
> The general problem is that our current site skin is using an old
version of doxia. This seems to be incompatible with the recent site plugin
version.
>
>
>
> The problem is, that we are not allowed to release if not using the
latest apache parent pom. So before being able to fix this, we are required to
fix this problem.
>
>
>
> I already started a feature branch tackling this problem some time
ago. The only problem with this is, that it produces a technically correct
website, but it looks really ugly.
>
>
>
> Anyone here have a few cycles to beautify the site generation? It’s on
the feature/site-generation-fixes branch.
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
