Hi Adam,

the Apache SNAPSHOT repo is at: 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots

Adding this to your pom should help:

  <!-- Make Snapshots of Apache projects available -->
  <repositories>
    <repository>
      <id>apache-snapshots</id>
      <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots</url>
      <releases>
        <enabled>false</enabled>
      </releases>
      <snapshots>
        <enabled>true</enabled>
      </snapshots>
    </repository>
  </repositories>

  <!-- Make Snapshots of Apache plugins available -->
  <pluginRepositories>
    <pluginRepository>
      <id>apache-snapshots</id>
      <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots</url>
      <releases>
        <enabled>false</enabled>
      </releases>
      <snapshots>
        <enabled>true</enabled>
      </snapshots>
    </pluginRepository>
  </pluginRepositories>

Chris
Am 23.08.20, 18:56 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <ac.ro...@gmail.com>:

    Sure thing. Is 0.8.0-snapshot hosted anywhere or is that something that 
needs to be built? Regards Adam

    > On Aug 23, 2020, at 12:31 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Hmm ... 
    > 
    > Could you possibly give 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT a try? .... or 0.6.x? ... 0.7.0 
was the first of the new generation drivers. We're maintaining the 0.6 branch 
and working hard on making the new generation drivers 100% production ready.
    > 
    > Chris
    > 
    > 
    > Am 23.08.20, 18:06 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <ac.ro...@gmail.com>:
    > 
    >    This is the latest 0.7.0 release from Maven. 
    > 
    > 
    >    Regards Adam
    > 
    >> On Aug 23, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Christofer Dutz 
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
    >> 
    >> Hi Adam,
    >> 
    >> which version of PLC4X are you using? I know we had similar reports some 
time ago, but had thought we had fixed them
    >> 
    >> Chris
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Am 23.08.20, 16:40 schrieb "Adam Rossi" <ac.ro...@gmail.com>:
    >> 
    >>   Howdy. I am seeing a persistent thread being created for every
    >>   plcConnection connect which looks like the following:
    >> 
    >>   Name: nioEventLoopGroup-11-1
    >>   State: RUNNABLE
    >>   Total blocked: 0  Total waited: 0
    >> 
    >>   Stack trace:
    >>   java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch.EPoll.wait(Native Method)
    >>   java.base@13.0.2
    >>   /sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:120)
    >>   java.base@13.0.2
    >>   /sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:124)
    >>      - locked io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySet@f6df6b
    >>      - locked sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl@7ffc19
    >>   java.base@13.0.2/sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:141)
    >>   
app//io.netty.channel.nio.SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.select(SelectedSelectionKeySetSelector.java:68)
    >>   app//io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.select(NioEventLoop.java:803)
    >>   app//io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:457)
    >>   
app//io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:989)
    >>   
app//io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
    >>   
app//io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
    >>   java.base@13.0.2/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:830)
    >> 
    >> 
    >>   This happens both when creating a connection directly or when using the
    >>   plc4x connection pool.
    >> 
    >>   In both cases I am obtaining the connection, reading some modbus 
values,
    >>   and then closing the connection. From the plcConnection metadata the
    >>   connection type I am using is:
    >> 
    >>   org.apache.plc4x.java.spi.connection.DefaultNettyPlcConnection
    >> 
    >>   Over time thousands of these nioEventLoopGroup threads are created and 
I
    >>   experience an OutOfMemory error in my program.
    >> 
    >>   Has anyone experienced this problem? Is there a way to force these 
threads
    >>   to close, timeout, or to specify the total thread limit?
    >> 
    >>   Thanks and Regards, Adam
    >> 
    > 

Reply via email to