On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Meanwhile, you have expressed a -1 and can not provide a specific > > reason to back it up. I would strongly suggest that the appropriate > > time to bring up such an objection is when you have the data to back > > it up. Feel free to say "I told you so" at that time. > > I do have part of the data and am in the process of gathering more and have > complied with requests to do so and offered. Overriding my -1 is a bit > rash. Patent searches often take weeks or years, you are requiring me to do > one faster. You will need to forcibly remove me/my commit privs from the > project in order to override my -1. I do not accept that I've not provided > valid reasons and am not working to provide more. I'm frankly willing to be > kicked out of the project that I founded by Microsoft/SourceSense/Apache > rather than sign my good name on to what is frankly a sloppy job on the > legal side.
Please do *not* put words in my mouth. I am *not* requiring you to do anything faster. I am simply saying that a policy whereby we pull specific functions if/when you find something is a much more sane policy than blocking all work merely because you have suspicions. - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
