forget JiBX, it looks deader than XMLBeans
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Mark Murphy <jmarkmur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone look at JiBX? it is released under the 3-clause BSD license. > http://jibx.sourceforge.net/jibx-license.html. It contains some code that > is uder the Apache 1.1 license which should be ok, and some code under XPP3 > which is not listed by Apache, but appears to be based on the BSD license. > > Concerning XPP3, clause 3 may be problematic because it is not directly in > the BSD 3 clause. This third clause is not the advertising clause found in > the BCD 4 clause, but it is similar as it applies to documentation, so that > could be a problem. Maybe legal should look at it and give a ruling. > Finally, XPP3 clauses 4 and 5 appear to my non-legal eyes to be the same > and equivalent to the BSD clause 3. > > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Andreas Beeker <kiwiwi...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> There's a workaround for the GPL problem: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-264 >> >> ... but my last experiments with the current ECMA schemas weren't so >> successful: >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46869482/ >> >> >> On 3/9/18 2:05 PM, Murphy, Mark wrote: >> > Since JAXB is being dropped from Java SE (deprecated in Java 9, removed >> in Java 11), I don't think that this will be a problem. There may be other >> marshallers out there, but the more immediate problem is that we need to >> remove all JAXB code from POI because we can no longer rely on the JVM >> implementation, and the JAXB project is GPL code. >> >> >> >
